View Full Version : John Deere 3000 series
fearthedeere
11-13-2006, 01:02 PM
I've been doing my homework on compact tractors as of late, and I've become quite interested in the Deere 3000 TWENTY series tractors. anyone have experience with these? can lift about 1600lbs with a 300cx loader, the one I quoted comes with read and mid PTO, cat. 1 3pt. hitch, and twin touch hydro tranny. I'll be doing a variety of applications from planting trees with augers, loader work, seed bed prep, and possibly some large area mowing. Any thoughts?
POPO4995
11-13-2006, 01:07 PM
I am really thinking about purchasing a JD 3203. I rented one last week to move some trees around and things of that nature and wow, I was impressed. Lots of low end torque, plenty of power, easy to operate, and looks great! I was picking up 1200 lb. trees with no problem. I think you woudl be happy with a 3000 series tractor, i'm working a deal on one right now, you should too! :clapping: :clapping:
fearthedeere
11-13-2006, 07:04 PM
really? I would be interested to try out and compare the 3203 against the TWENTY series tractors such as the 3520 as the 3203 is an economy version. I really liked the price on the 3203, but as my JD rep explained some differences I started to gravitate towards a 20 series especially in the aspect that a 20 series can sport a 300CX loader that lifts twice as much as the 300 loader on the 3203. Also, the 3203 cannot be fitted with a mid PTO which for me in particular is something of interest for me as it can mow with a 72" 7 iron deck under there if need be. Breakout force of the 300 loader is also considerably lower....now this may not matter for you which is great because the 3203 was almost 17k with the 300 loader as compared to the 3520 at 24K with the 300CX loader and mid-pto options. I just want to make sure that I'm buying a versatile machine when I get one because I absolutely hate it when a piece of my equip. doesn't have the power for a particular task. My roomate tried to sell me on Kubota, but upon looking at the spec sheets, the only real feature the kubota has over the deere is that it can lift more (on paper).
FearThisDeere
11-13-2006, 08:14 PM
If you can afford the difference in price, go for the 3520. It is a bit more of the tractor and the mid PTO open up more options like you mentioned. If you are really concerned about the capacity of the loader, the 3520 is the way to go. I think that you have made the decision for yourself already based on your posts. Anyhting Deere is better than Kubota anyway.
johndeereguy
11-14-2006, 11:21 PM
If you are going to get a twenty series why not go ahead and get the Deere soundguard cab with it. I have it on my 4720 and would not be without. Otherwise, you will love a deere tractor
fearthedeere
11-15-2006, 02:04 AM
haha, Fearthisdeere, well I usually do my homework as best I can and see if anyone can dissuade me of my preliminary opinions when it comes to equipment, so your statement that I've made a decision is not totally unfounded.
As far as a cab goes...it'd be nice for work in extreme weather conditions, but I doubt 5.5K worth especially with landscape work where inevitably I'll be working around many trees and in tight spaces.
Thanks for your input guys.
FearThisDeere
11-15-2006, 07:49 PM
haha, Fearthisdeere, well I usually do my homework as best I can and see if anyone can dissuade me of my preliminary opinions when it comes to equipment, so your statement that I've made a decision is not totally unfounded.
I am the same way. I always know what I want! As long as it is green, you can't go wrong.
floydboy
12-11-2006, 12:37 AM
The 3203 is just a hydrostatic and the 3020 series has a ehydro transmission which is much more reliable or you can get a 12 speed shuttle shift trans called the PowerReverser. The 3203 also cannot accomidate a frame mount backhoe as can the 3020 series. The 3203 is a striped down 3020 series. It is still a grat tractor but if your budget can handle it, go for one of the 3020 series tractors. You will be able to add more later and it is so much more comfortable.
fearthedeere
12-12-2006, 12:30 AM
Thanx for the info floyboy. I wonder how the ehydro tranny is more reliable than the regular hyro in the 3203?
teamoneoutdoors
12-12-2006, 08:19 AM
In researching a compact tractor around the 33 hp range take an opportunity to look at the Challenger 265B tractor sold through Caterpillar dealers. I purchased one this spring and it has been a great tractor. Our Cat dealer, as do many other dealers, places new tractors in the rental fleet of equipment. Through this program you can purchase a "like new" tractor while saving on the purchase price. We purchased ours with 175 hours on it and it looked and ran great.
http://www.challenger-ag.com/agco/Challenger/ChallengerNA/CompactTractors/MT200.htm
I own John Deere Commercial mowing equipment but could not turn down the quality of the Challenger at the price, warranty, and servicing capabilities of the Caterpillar dealer. My knowledge of the service program is great because I used to be a sales representative for the dealer before I started my own business.
Good Luck!
I have a JD 3520 w/ 300CX loader. Very pleased with it. They got it right with this series.
JDSKIDSTEER
12-25-2006, 05:29 PM
The 3203 is a good reliable cheap priced tractor to compete with some of the lower end tractors on the market. I found if I sit someone in it and then sit them on the 3320 they like the 3320 comfort better. 3203 has cheap no suspension seat and no cruise control. It is a no frills tractor.
floydboy
01-09-2007, 02:56 AM
Thanx for the info floyboy. I wonder how the ehydro tranny is more reliable than the regular hyro in the 3203?
The ehydro transmission does not require much maintenance like a standard linkage hydro tranny. The twin touch forward & reverse pedals use a sealed electronic module that sends a signal to the transmission unlike to standard hydro that uses metal linkage that runs to the transaxle. The ehydro transmission can also be programmed to meet you convenience needs. In my experience with them they have been extremely reliable from the the old hydro such as the 3203 or 55 series in the 90's. I'm not saying that the 3203 is not a good tractor, but the 3000 or 4000 twenty series is better. Also more expensive.
JDWalkbehind
01-12-2007, 08:11 PM
well i just got my Z this summer and do the mowing at our house (or will be this summer) and i don't really need my tractor any more b/c i want a stander or w/b and dad doesn't need his either so we are looking into a 2520 with loader and mower somethin kinda small to take the place of the tractors but big enough to do dirt/ mowin work. and they have really good loader weight and low end torqe, and it's alot cheaper then the 3000 series by like 6000. but later later on were goin to get a 5000 series and then ( if we get it) the 2520 will be all mine. but either way they are great compact tractors.
nick
02powerstroke
01-28-2007, 11:25 PM
I've been doing my homework on compact tractors as of late, and I've become quite interested in the Deere 3000 TWENTY series tractors. anyone have experience with these? can lift about 1600lbs with a 300cx loader, the one I quoted comes with read and mid PTO, cat. 1 3pt. hitch, and twin touch hydro tranny. I'll be doing a variety of applications from planting trees with augers, loader work, seed bed prep, and possibly some large area mowing. Any thoughts?
My family has a 3320 and its awsome we use it with a 6ft landpride rake, post hole digger, manure spreader and a brush hog its an awsome little tractor. Here it is raking leafs off my road with the rake. http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e398/bryrylan/Image007.jpg
fearthedeere
01-29-2007, 04:00 AM
That's a nice looking tractor, friend. Thanks for your input. However, for now I've decided due to my small landscape install volume that I'm just going to stick to renting a bobcat or a tractor if I have some heavy work to do...maybe a few years after I get outta college I'll be in a more comfortable place to succumb to such an investment. Thanks!
Kevin
floydboy
01-29-2007, 08:32 PM
In researching a compact tractor around the 33 hp range take an opportunity to look at the Challenger 265B tractor sold through Caterpillar dealers. I purchased one this spring and it has been a great tractor. Our Cat dealer, as do many other dealers, places new tractors in the rental fleet of equipment. Through this program you can purchase a "like new" tractor while saving on the purchase price. We purchased ours with 175 hours on it and it looked and ran great.
http://www.challenger-ag.com/agco/Challenger/ChallengerNA/CompactTractors/MT200.htm
I own John Deere Commercial mowing equipment but could not turn down the quality of the Challenger at the price, warranty, and servicing capabilities of the Caterpillar dealer. My knowledge of the service program is great because I used to be a sales representative for the dealer before I started my own business.
Good Luck!
Just so you know,the Challenger is the same tractor by Massey Ferguson. The are produced through AGCO corp.
7 IRON
01-31-2007, 03:37 PM
I've been doing my homework on compact tractors as of late, and I've become quite interested in the Deere 3000 TWENTY series tractors. anyone have experience with these? can lift about 1600lbs with a 300cx loader, the one I quoted comes with read and mid PTO, cat. 1 3pt. hitch, and twin touch hydro tranny. I'll be doing a variety of applications from planting trees with augers, loader work, seed bed prep, and possibly some large area mowing. Any thoughts?
Go For The 3000 Twenty Series!Worth The Extra $.E-Hydro,3 ranges,Better
Loader Option,Mid Pto,Backhoe Option,Ect.
teamoneoutdoors
01-31-2007, 05:47 PM
Just so you know,the Challenger is the same tractor by Massey Ferguson. The are produced through AGCO corp.
Yes, I know they are the same tractor and knew that before I purchased it. The main point I was trying to make on the Challenger/CAT dealers is the opportunity to buy a "like new" rental machine and save on the purchase price which was the major concern of the original post. In addition their service capablilites in my area are far greater than many of the other manufacturers because of their large mobile service fleet.
Don't get me wrong, had I not had the relationship as a former employee of the CAT dealer and the "rental fleet" option, I would have considered the John Deere product over the Challenger. Both a great machines.
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.