View Full Version : Which logo do you like better?
03-13-2007, 10:21 PM
Here are a couple of logos that I had made up. I just can't decide which one I like better. All your opinions would be appreciated. Thanks
03-13-2007, 10:47 PM
2nd one. Its cleaner and easier to read IMO.
03-13-2007, 10:54 PM
Make that two votes for the second one. Very clean and easy to read. In the first one the "s" in the background will be barely visible from a distance
03-13-2007, 11:25 PM
Second one is good, the first one looks like a gang logo lol.
03-13-2007, 11:27 PM
#2. Simple, easy to read. Very professional looking.
03-14-2007, 12:23 AM
Second is much cleaner. The S logo behind sinopoli along with the squeeze makes it tough to read at a glance.
03-14-2007, 01:04 AM
I'd go with #2.
03-14-2007, 10:04 AM
I second the second.
03-14-2007, 10:05 AM
I third the second.
03-14-2007, 10:14 AM
#2 Much cleaner. Much more professional looking. We need to keep our business as simple as possible, as profitable as possible and as professional as possible.
Good luck, looks great!
03-14-2007, 10:32 AM
I like the second one as well but id use the colors from the first one
03-14-2007, 10:47 AM
#2, much nicer looking......................
03-14-2007, 11:02 AM
I'll be the first one to say I like #1 the best. I think it will look alot better on the side of you trucks and on letter head.
The second one reminds me of these signs you see at the small strip malls where the management only allows on style of sign. It seems like to many straight lines. We are in an industry that hates straight lines.
03-14-2007, 03:11 PM
i second number 1
williams- straight lines on the grass is what we do best
03-14-2007, 04:29 PM
# 2, LOOKS alot better!
03-14-2007, 04:55 PM
Like it needs to be said...the second one is the best.
03-14-2007, 05:40 PM
Chalk another one for the second one.
03-14-2007, 08:02 PM
I like the third one......
Pristine Lawn Care
03-17-2007, 04:22 AM
#2 fore sure
03-17-2007, 04:26 AM
Add another vote for #2.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.