View Full Version : Switch to Walkers or other Z Bagger ?
grassworks
03-23-2002, 10:47 AM
I'm thinking of going with A Walker Ghs 44" or similar machines to replace our old system of 36" to 48" walk behind mowers. In our area , it appears these Z vacum rear baggers are supperior in speed and performance. Residential customers expect weekly bagging and it is a neccessity to stay competitive. I am bagging with our walk behind (grass catcher) but it takes forever on the 10- 12k lawns. Does anyone have reccomendations on a mower like the Walker ghs (rear bagger /hopper) with the smalller deck under 50" ? I have to have a smaller deck and I think that side discharge bagging takes up too much space. Any suggestions or reccomendations would be great.
1grnlwn
03-23-2002, 10:59 AM
It's time these customers wake up and realize that "bagging" is a waste of energy and national resource. Unless a large amount of leaves are involved, let it fly. Or bag it and stuff it in their Canyonero (largest SUV made featured on Simpsons). Sorry I know this doesn't answer your problem really.
Mark
1grnlwn
03-23-2002, 11:00 AM
OOPs welcome to Lawnsite. During silly season I sometimes loose my manners.
grassworks
03-23-2002, 11:07 AM
I hate bagging too but can't keep clippings out of beds and other areas. Expectations are higher now on us than ever ( prices have not went up though :( )
LAWNGODFATHER
03-23-2002, 01:04 PM
Toro, Walker, Scag, Ransome Bobcat all make similar systems.
However I do agree with 1grnlwn.
Get a operator controlled discharge chute and your problem is solved.
BigJim
03-23-2002, 01:53 PM
We bag most lawns here,the Walker has the best bagging set up available,it also offers the advantage of being able to change the deck if you want side discharge or mulching mowing.Mine has the 42" deck, but that suits our smaller lawns and gates we go through.Contact your local dealer and have a demo I'm sure you'll be impressed........
slplow
03-23-2002, 02:33 PM
You will save big time with the walker.I will be runing 2 48'' ghs this yr one a 98'' 20 hp and a new 26efi. Last year one of my neighborhoods of 12 lawns we save 30 to 45 minutes on average over two 52'' hydro wb with sulky's bagging. Running one walker and one wb. I hope this year to save one hr. Go with the walker on this type of machine, the others are only copycats and from what I heard don't compare to the walker.
proscapeINC
03-23-2002, 05:17 PM
I tested many machines there is nothing that compares to a walker.This year I bought my second saves alot of trimming time great for spring and fall clean-ups and great stripes. I own a diesil and a 20 hp all with 9.0 bushel hopper
MOW ED
03-24-2002, 08:55 AM
If you have to bag, Walker is the best. I own a 26EFI w a 42GHS deck. It gets into small gated yards. It is extremely maneuverable in small areas and gives an excellent cut. The GHS system is great for grass as well as thatch and fall leaves. If you dont have small gated backyards, get a 48"GHS deck. Find your local dealer/distributor and demo one. They cost a little more but you will make that up and then some by the time savings.
I know many guys will say you have to educate your customers about not bagging. You are working for them and if they want it bagged then bag it and charge them. I have had some success in not bagging but there are some that are not gonna change and they are willing to pay. So be it.
Walkers will not beat an Exmark, Dixie, Toro etc on the flat out mow and blow but for the specialty market and bagging there is no better mower out there. If you want more info, e-mail me.
Strongmd
03-24-2002, 09:06 AM
Obviously side-discharging all year would be best, but it's not an option up here except in July/August. If you have to do a lot of bagging, I don't think anything touches a Walker. A mid-mount with a bagging system seems like a behemoth to me. The walker is very compact, self-contained and does not need a pony engine or a tube off of the side to bag. The walker-style toro might be an option, but I know nothing about it. It's the only non-walker that comes close.
believe id go with the one that is made for bagging .walker
to bad u cant see how clean doubles an the lazer are
on discharge. when im thru, u just dont see any grass.
Doc Pete
03-24-2002, 09:16 AM
Like some of us do in the fall, I run double gator blades (only the new high sail style) in the early part of the season when the lawns are thick. They mulch and blow the clippings well enough you don't need to bag. And, if you cut the lawn when it needs its, you really should not be needing to bag anyway. Also, customers that use a commercial fertilizer service are cut twice a week, in early season or I don't take on their lawn. In the long, there save money, since many "lawn robbers" charge them the same price per cut during the hot summer months to bag, when the lawn doesn't need it. ;)
Doc Pete
03-24-2002, 11:44 AM
Something else to consider is operator "maintainance". As an owner operator with 35 lawns part time (part time:D ), I tried 4 different riders before settling on the "Walker". However, after one day of use I returned it and went back to walkbehinds and a good velky. Maybe it's the type of lawns I do, but the bouncing on my body was more fatiging than the velky setup. Thinking it was just me, I asked other owner/operators who had been in business for over 10 years, like myself, about this problem. All of them confessed they had either back or neck problems from years of using a riders. I'm 52, "reworked" my Hustler walkbehind to fit my preferences, and am able to mow 8 lawns after work and come home as fresh as a daisy. All the riders I tried under similar conditions made me feel like I went 10 rounds of boxing. Please keep in mind, I'm 160 lbs., and not 260+ lbs. Also, I've matched my cutting time against Scags, Lazers and Bobcats, and have no problem easily staying up with them.
Pete
For Pete's Sake Landscaping
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.