DVS Hardscaper
08-14-2011, 11:51 AM
I can understand an HOA not allowing decks to extend past the side of a dwelling. A deck is usually elevated off the ground and harder to conceal. So in terms of decks, I can support such a covenant.
But for patios, I think the convenant is sometimes a little extreme. In which most HOA's convenants lump decks and patios in the same paragragh.
Does anyone have any idea of what I'm talking about?
A few years ago we did a nice patio where a portion of a seatwall was designed to extend about 12-inches from the side of the house. And the HOA denied the approval for the design.
Last week we started a new patio in a fairly new community. They have no formal HOA set up. Well, yesterday the owners received a letter from the builder saying the fire feature can not come past the side of the dwelling. This changes the whole -----n design. That, and the owners and neighbors said they did not even realize an architectural committee existed!
Like I said, decks are elevated. I can understand why they should not come past the dwelling's sides.
But patios......they're usually IN THE GROUND and concealed with plantings around the patio.
Let me put it like this: HOW IS A PATIO COMING 5-FEET PAST THE SIDE OF A DWELLING ANY DIFFERENT THAN A FORMAL FRONT PORCH???? Or Any different than a paver walk leading into the backyard???
Most convenants are copied from HOA to HOA. A developer will obtain convenants somewhere and will use the same convenants for all his/her communities.
This common convenant is something that both the landscape and hardscape industry need to LOBBY the HOA's and get them to review plans by a case by case basis.
I have worked in some HOA's where the houses are real close. So I can see them dis-approving a patio coming past the side(s).
But when you have a large lot, with a side load garage, or even a house on a corner lot where the house is positioned diagonally on the lot - there is no practical reason to deny a patio extending past the sides. And if the plan calls for well thought out planting, then where is the harm?
,
But for patios, I think the convenant is sometimes a little extreme. In which most HOA's convenants lump decks and patios in the same paragragh.
Does anyone have any idea of what I'm talking about?
A few years ago we did a nice patio where a portion of a seatwall was designed to extend about 12-inches from the side of the house. And the HOA denied the approval for the design.
Last week we started a new patio in a fairly new community. They have no formal HOA set up. Well, yesterday the owners received a letter from the builder saying the fire feature can not come past the side of the dwelling. This changes the whole -----n design. That, and the owners and neighbors said they did not even realize an architectural committee existed!
Like I said, decks are elevated. I can understand why they should not come past the dwelling's sides.
But patios......they're usually IN THE GROUND and concealed with plantings around the patio.
Let me put it like this: HOW IS A PATIO COMING 5-FEET PAST THE SIDE OF A DWELLING ANY DIFFERENT THAN A FORMAL FRONT PORCH???? Or Any different than a paver walk leading into the backyard???
Most convenants are copied from HOA to HOA. A developer will obtain convenants somewhere and will use the same convenants for all his/her communities.
This common convenant is something that both the landscape and hardscape industry need to LOBBY the HOA's and get them to review plans by a case by case basis.
I have worked in some HOA's where the houses are real close. So I can see them dis-approving a patio coming past the side(s).
But when you have a large lot, with a side load garage, or even a house on a corner lot where the house is positioned diagonally on the lot - there is no practical reason to deny a patio extending past the sides. And if the plan calls for well thought out planting, then where is the harm?
,