View Single Post
  #51  
Old 08-07-2011, 11:21 AM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIMCO-MEISTER View Post
I'm calling bullshit on this one. Watching it from inception? My azz.
Call all the bulls you want .... ain't gonna change anything.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FIMCO-MEISTER View Post
I'm also calling you out for misrepresenting my argument concerning smart controllers. I have never said a smart controller can't be a good tool for a water manger. I've said that cheap chinese smart controllers being installed in non-managed situations is a recipe for disaster. Casting false aspersions means you have a delusional memory or you are unethical. Which is it?
Ya think?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FIMCO-MEISTER View Post
The wm sl is easier but the rb smt is a better controller inmo. Still id install the rm espm with the upgraded rf sensor over either these two controllers.
..... One example ... and another .....

Quote:
Originally Posted by FIMCO-MEISTER View Post
I'd rather have customers with espm and wired in rf sensors than the et controllers currently available in the same price range. Now upgrade to an internet based that i can monitor from my office or home and id be more inclined to go for it.
Is that enough or do I need to find more?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FIMCO-MEISTER View Post
For the rest of you this is an excellent report done by an outstanding university with all the elements necessary to do a fair evaluation of the ten controllers used in this study. If you want to be misled by Kiril's ranting then power to you. I'd still read the study and judge for yourself. What Kiril has to say about it is totally irrelevant in my opinion.
Yea, because proper controller scheduling and accurately determining site conditions that directly affect irrigation management decisions doesn't have anything to do with irrigation.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.04367 seconds with 7 queries