View Single Post
  #206  
Old 05-24-2012, 04:51 PM
cindyb's Avatar
cindyb cindyb is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: KY
Posts: 354
If I understand the Florida Supreme court ruling, this group of attorneys didn't do their clients right on the Benlate settlement. The tree company was expecting about $200,000.00 so the attorney kept the rest? So they were collecting part of the clients money and working with Dupont?

Quote:
The Florida Bar brought separate disciplinary actions against the four named partners of the firm alleging that they committed misconduct by engaging in a secret “engagement agreement” with the DuPont Corporation, solely for their own financial benefit, while they were representing the clients in the Benlate cases against DuPont.
.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.03682 seconds with 7 queries