View Single Post
Old 05-24-2012, 04:51 PM
cindyb's Avatar
cindyb cindyb is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: KY
Posts: 354
If I understand the Florida Supreme court ruling, this group of attorneys didn't do their clients right on the Benlate settlement. The tree company was expecting about $200,000.00 so the attorney kept the rest? So they were collecting part of the clients money and working with Dupont?

The Florida Bar brought separate disciplinary actions against the four named partners of the firm alleging that they committed misconduct by engaging in a secret “engagement agreement” with the DuPont Corporation, solely for their own financial benefit, while they were representing the clients in the Benlate cases against DuPont.
Reply With Quote
Page generated in 0.04011 seconds with 8 queries