View Single Post
  #7  
Old 10-04-2012, 05:09 PM
Wet_Boots's Avatar
Wet_Boots Wet_Boots is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: metro NYC
Posts: 40,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACC View Post
Thank you Wet Boots, cjohn, mdirr and Al. Your comments help. Texas's code says that the purpose is to ensure 'accurate testing of the backflow preventer.' A lab engineer/tech at fccchr said on the phone that a non-constant pressure and so all the resultant cycling of the backflow parts tend to promote a higher fail rate, hence the recommendation in general and requirement for new installations in many states.

Whether it is worth the thousand dollars or so to move the master valve to the discharge side on old installations seems a guess to me. Liability issues are big here at the HOA, so with a stretch of reasoning, this might justify the expense.
As long as you have no issues with higher fail rates, you can keep things as is. Performance is certainly not going to be better than customary, and it could be quite worse. I remember PVBs failing at less than two years of age, when a normal installation would have given over a decade of worry-free service.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.03197 seconds with 7 queries