Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-12-2010, 11:58 AM
hortman30 hortman30 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sun Valley, ID
Posts: 1
Performance Based pay

Our employees have been doing the same jobs slower and slower every year. We try to implement no-overtime policies, but something always comes up (equipment break-down, etc.). We are considering paying each mow crew on a per yard basis. Does anyone have experience with this and how to handle taxes, insurance, unemployment, etc.?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-12-2010, 12:33 PM
albhb3's Avatar
albhb3 albhb3 is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: eagan mn
Posts: 502
how about GPS trackers? Or cameras
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-13-2010, 12:53 AM
grassman177's Avatar
grassman177 grassman177 is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: leavenworth, kansas
Posts: 9,786
i think this warrants a good discussion, and will add a few myself.

i am performance based pretty much. we have a system that works well so far. i am a crew leader and get payed a certain percentage of each job, minus labor and materials are shared costs. this gives a pretty good reason to get as much done as possible but do a good job as going back on a job only costs us money. well, lost revenue at the very least.

we pay our labor by the hour so when you have bad days due to whatever, you make less but they always make the same. i was thinking about implementing a percentage system(vary with experience and performance in amount per individual) for them too, but i know it would be very hard for some to choose it as some paychecks really might now be that great. adversely, some would be very good.

i am sure it could be shown to them the advantages of it, fut still then i am pretty sure they would not go for it like they were getting screwed or something. you know how these guys are. we are however are known to be fair, respectful and generous with good employees.

this would be a great way to control labor costs better and i think with motivation these guys might actually make more if they just work a little harder and smarter. this way they can directly see the benefit.
__________________
all is fair in love and grass! Man, it smells like sheet, do you smell that!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-19-2010, 11:57 PM
zurfsturfcare's Avatar
zurfsturfcare zurfsturfcare is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dover, Ohio
Posts: 327
i agree 100%, when you find a system that works let me know
__________________
2007 Chevy 3500 Crew cab
2004 Chevy 1500 Reg Cab
16x7 Tandem Axle Trailer
12x 6 Single Axle Trailer
48" Hustler WB
52" Toro WB
42" Toro WB
All fitted with Pro-slides
3 JD 21" Mowers
Stihl Trimmers & Blowers
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-23-2010, 02:01 PM
New2TheGreenIndustry New2TheGreenIndustry is online now
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: GA
Posts: 533
The company I work for has all full time employees on salary. A 2 man crew will do 75 yards in a week and a 3 man crew will do 100. The number of yards will vary depending on your area and average size of the yards. There are pros and cons to doing it this way. A pro to this system would be a fixed labor rate and no ovetime hours. One of the flaws I see in the system is that the guys are busting their hump to get all the yards done and things can get sloppy.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-24-2010, 02:17 PM
GrassNat GrassNat is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2
Hourly + incentives

To put it plainly, I'm tired of busting my hump as a one-man show in the sole-proprietor arena for the past 7 years. Therefore, I came up with an idea of hiring just a couple of individuals, experience preferred, and pay them not only an hourly wage but an incentive as well.

For instance: if they use my equipment, I would pay $10 per hour plus $3 per property. If they use their own equipment, I would pay $12 per hour plus $5 per property.

Weekly or bi-weekly checks would be mailed out with either taxes taken out or just 1099 them. I haven't decided which to do yet.....whatever's easiest.

Granted, the number and size of the properties I have may be a crumb on the table compared to the full-course dinners some of you might have. I simply can't be everywhere at once to keep this business growing.

Currently, the only employee I have right now is myself. From the business end to the labor end and absolutely everything in between. I thought maybe this year I'll try something different and see where it goes.

Let me know what you folks think.
__________________
Member of the PNC Park grounds crew.

Last edited by GrassNat; 01-24-2010 at 02:24 PM. Reason: Trying to show signature
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-26-2010, 08:36 AM
AllHardscaping AllHardscaping is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Gilberts, IL
Posts: 77
Paying them $10 an hour and then $3 per lawn is not performance or incentive based. I'd give them x amount when they complete a given daily goal whethre it be based on # of lawns or $ sales for the day.

Like someone else said you have to keep an eye on qulaity because they'll plow through them as quick as possible.
__________________
http://www.PaverProtector.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-26-2010, 09:32 AM
supercuts's Avatar
supercuts supercuts is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CT shoreline
Posts: 2,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllHardscaping View Post
Paying them $10 an hour and then $3 per lawn is not performance or incentive based. I'd give them x amount when they complete a given daily goal whethre it be based on # of lawns or $ sales for the day.

Like someone else said you have to keep an eye on qulaity because they'll plow through them as quick as possible.
their are so many difficulties with these systems, not to say they cant work. but basing it on # of lawns or $ sales there are many flaws. think of it from the employee point of view. if he works just as hard each day and only makes the goal 2 or 3 times a week he might start to think, hey, im doing bigger lawns mon/wen, why am i being penalized? or im working harder on thursday but we're not grossing as much, maybe my boss didnt price these lawns right and i shouldnt have to suffer for that.

mix that negative thought with rushing sloppy work. then you get upset and tell them to do a better job if they want to make more. they get even more mad your taking it out on them and before you know it, you've fired all your guys or they have quit. and whose dime is it on when a machine goes down. if im the employee, im on the job, not my problem your machiens fail.

it would be great if you had an excact time it takes you to complete your work and try to have one guy repeat it. when you have a crew out, it only takes one guy dragging his feet to ruin it for all of them and that isnt fair.
__________________
20 years total service, Full Time since 03'

trucks
mowers
stuff

Sig Sauer Sercurity
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-26-2010, 09:50 AM
MarcSmith MarcSmith is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 7,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrassNat View Post
For instance: if they use my equipment, I would pay $10 per hour plus $3 per property. If they use their own equipment, I would pay $12 per hour plus $5 per property.
sound like a liability nightmare. oh, and good luck finding a sub contractor to work for you for 12-15 bucks per hour...

first. multiple equipment break downs warrant an investigation. is it as a result of poor PM's, old worn out equipment or operator error. If its poor PM then they service guy needs to disciplined for missing things on the PM service. PMis not juts changing oil and sharping blades. its looking over teh machine for cracked belts, loose nuts/bolts, ect... If its old worn out equipment replace it. if it operator error..discipline.

if guys are working slow. then hold the crew leader responsible. discipline accordingly. once he realize that annual raises and bonus' are being based on his performance and annual reviews he will either get the crew in gear or let you know who is not performing and ask for new crew members.

there is also the fluctuating work week based pay. it kills overtime. it actually starts dropping the hourly wage for hours worked past 40... is a salary base though...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-26-2010, 11:30 AM
twcw5804 twcw5804 is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Decatur, Illinois
Posts: 436
As business owners we all have monthy net income goals that we like to achieve. So what would be wrong with setting up a bonus for months when lets say your goal is $5k and you get $7k net give them a $250 bonus.

But if they are dragging and racking up more hours, breaking equipment, and so on they cost your more. So no bonus.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
employment , pay , performance

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 PM.

Page generated in 0.11709 seconds with 7 queries