Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-29-2014, 04:45 AM
Aussie-Gardener Aussie-Gardener is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 96
Turf tiger 52 or tiger cat 52

Hi guys

For those of you that have experienced these mowers, can you let me know why you would pick one over the other?

I know there is higher price and higher weight but I have read that the tiger is great on slopes with great traction. Hill side work is important to me and also less rips in the turf.

Does enough of the 52 stick out on the tiger to mow close to tight objects?

Thanks for any advice.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-29-2014, 06:11 PM
djagusch djagusch is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 3,454
Turf tiger is good for 61" and 72". Tiger cat for 48" and 52". I don't understand why they offer the tt in 52".

Weight, trimside of deck just makes the tiger cat ideal.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-29-2014, 08:10 PM
Aussie-Gardener Aussie-Gardener is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 96
Ok.
Do you think the tiger cat as good on the slopes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-29-2014, 09:12 PM
djagusch djagusch is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 3,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aussie-Gardener View Post
Ok.
Do you think the tiger cat as good on the slopes.
Haven't road one enough to tell you. Guessing the tt is better based on width, weight, and cog.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-29-2014, 09:29 PM
LLandscaping LLandscaping is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hayden, Alabama
Posts: 1,002
We had two Tiger cubs and now have 3 Turf Tigers. The turf tigers do much better on hills. The cubs would lose traction and slide. Have two 52's and a 61' turf tiger. Only downside no deck overhang on the 52". The 61" doesn't track as bad as 52". I think it has wider wheels.
__________________
Adam Lovell
Lovell's Landscape Management Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-30-2014, 02:36 AM
Aussie-Gardener Aussie-Gardener is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by LLandscaping View Post
We had two Tiger cubs and now have 3 Turf Tigers. The turf tigers do much better on hills. The cubs would lose traction and slide. Have two 52's and a 61' turf tiger. Only downside no deck overhang on the 52". The 61" doesn't track as bad as 52". I think it has wider wheels.
Hi
Does the hillside traction out way the lack of deck overhang on the TT 52.

I currently have a Wright Z 48 and would hate to go backwards and have less traction on my hilly jobs.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-01-2014, 01:49 AM
Aussie-Gardener Aussie-Gardener is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 96
Do you think fuel use would be much more on a TT 52 EFI to a Tiger Cat 52 Carbi.

Or does the EFI help a little.

EFI better for cold starts also?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-01-2014, 06:19 AM
dathorpe dathorpe is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Marshall, Va.
Posts: 338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aussie-Gardener View Post
Do you think fuel use would be much more on a TT 52 EFI to a Tiger Cat 52 Carbi.

Or does the EFI help a little.

EFI better for cold starts also?
EFI starts better in the cold and is definitely more fuel efficient. I know this from personal experience.

I agree with one of the previous posters who said Tiger Cat for 52" and smaller, Turf Tiger (or Cheetah) for 61" and larger.

Also, and I don't know if this matters to you, but I always see 48" and 52" Tiger Cats for sale used. It's rare to see a Turf Tiger for sale used and if you do, it's always priced high. At least, that's how it is in my area. So if resale value means anything to you...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-01-2014, 08:19 AM
Aussie-Gardener Aussie-Gardener is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 96
Yeah the TT 52 has 1 inch over hang of the deck each side. The tiger cat 3.25

My wright z 48 only has 1inch also. I know more would be nice but I will trade that for better hillside performance.

I can see plenty of value in the TT for $2000 more and for a 5-10 yr investment 2k more is better then me selling if I make the wrong choice.

My main problem is here in AUS I won't find a dealer willing to give me test runs on either machine other than in a car park.

I can't compare anything else to the wright and I would rate it as average on slopes but I know it's limits.

I only hear good things about the TT on slopes.

The dealers look at me strange when I ask about the TT 52. I don't think there are any in the country but I'm in no rush.

Then again how many hrs do the dealers use these machines

Thanks for the replies guys.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 AM.

Page generated in 0.07483 seconds with 7 queries