Register free!
Search
 
     

Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-15-2004, 09:10 AM
jd boy jd boy is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: nw ohio
Posts: 179
Pond Construction

My company only uses aquascape. My installers are comfortable with the product, and I think my customers will be hard pressed to find a better looking water feature than what they can install.

It took us a while to figure out what things we could do to make our ponds look better than competition. Anyone can did a hole and throw rock in it. Be creative and place each rock, Never stack rock. After all you don't see that in nature, and that is your inspiration
Attached Images
     
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-15-2004, 11:12 AM
stxkyboy's Avatar
stxkyboy stxkyboy is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: cincinnati oh
Posts: 222
I will respond how i respond to all of these types of waterfalls....the gravel "borders" look horrible, unnatural, and unnessecary. I dont understand why people install them that way and i dont understand how you sell customers on that. The gravel border is my largest complaint against waterfalls and i think that it seperates highend work from wanna-bes. In the end it does look like all you did was dig a hole and throw rock in it because while you may have placed the large rocks it then looks like you just got lazy and dumped a couple tons of gravel in to fill everything else up.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-15-2004, 11:28 AM
jd boy jd boy is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: nw ohio
Posts: 179
Firstly, in terms of high end work, there is no better construction method. What is your alternative? Any more boulders make things look messy and contribed.
Also when the goundcover and plants mature the stone will be hidden and softned completing the entire landcape.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-15-2004, 11:36 AM
stxkyboy's Avatar
stxkyboy stxkyboy is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: cincinnati oh
Posts: 222
Look at my other post in this heading ...third one down.....now i know its not the best pics or even that great of a waterfall but atleast we didnt use peagravel filler. It looks extremely tacky.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-15-2004, 12:35 PM
jd boy jd boy is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: nw ohio
Posts: 179
I guess we will have to agree to disagree. Personally, I can't imagine calling a stacked stone wall with one piece of flagstone for a sheet rock "high end."

Really the only difference is rather than river stone you piled up tones of smaller rock. By using river stone & mulch around our water features we can tie it into the entire landscape. Other planting beds around the site we will incorporate alot of the same stone. Thus, creating an entire setting.

To me, your looks like a rock slide & is unfinished. After all they call it river stone because that is where it comes from!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-15-2004, 12:41 PM
GreenMonster's Avatar
GreenMonster GreenMonster is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,705
jd-

I think those are real nice looking waterfalls/ponds. I DO think some plantings within the stone would help soften the look and make it look more natural.

It doesn't look like "pea gravel" to me. Looks like, well, um..... RIVER ROCK?!?!
__________________
Mark
Green Monster Landscapes

"Blue eyed boy meets a brown eyed girl.... oh oh oh the sweetest thing"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 AM.

Page generated in 0.08897 seconds with 8 queries