The Green Industry's Resource Center

Thread Tools   Display Modes
Old 12-14-2005, 08:33 PM
P & L Turf's Avatar
P & L Turf P & L Turf is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: P & L Turf Tavern
Posts: 273
Someone metioned to me today , what if they decreased the size of the pulleys that are on the deck now, to give it a higher rpm. Would this work?
Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 04:50 PM
steinerman steinerman is offline
LawnSite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: west liberty ohio
Posts: 7
steiner mower

Is anyone running a ventrac deck on a steiner tractor. We have 4 steiner and have 4, 5 foot decks and 3, 6 foot decks but the six footers get beat up a lot,and bend then cut uneven. From the people driving them not caring I tried a ventrac liked the power, but didn't like how big it was, and didn't like the controls on the side. They need to get them like a steiner. Then I was looking at the deck and its roller was different and didn't seem to strip as well. I do own a ventrac landscape rake and love it. Ventrac does have stiener bet on that. Thanks for any info
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2006, 12:51 PM
muddstopper's Avatar
muddstopper muddstopper is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: transition zone
Posts: 2,343
I run the steiner deck on the ventrac without any problems. I like the controls on the side of the ventrac, I would think the Ventrac deck should work on the steiner. I also have the foot pedal but have considered taking it off. Seems every time I start to get off the machine i hit the pedal.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Layout Style:

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Grand View Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:08 AM.

Page generated in 0.06122 seconds with 10 queries