Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-09-2006, 08:28 PM
CutsForLess's Avatar
CutsForLess CutsForLess is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: East Texas
Posts: 75
Walk behind vs. rider

I have a dixie chopper that I really like and a 26" exmark for small yards, but I have been thinking of getting a walkbehind. Im wondering if I would like the walkbehind enough to sale the chopper. I like riding on the big lots but I have found out a rider is not a priority most of the time, I think it just adds to your overhead more than anything. My question is can I cut as fast with a walkbehind hydro with a sulky as I can with my chopper? Is the rider worth the added expense, I mean its paid for but I could always sell it if I liked the walkbehind enough. I think I could almost get 2 walkbehinds for a little more than I paid for the chopper, maybe a small one like a 36" and then a 48", what do you think? Another thing is would the hydro be that much faster than my 26" metro I mean I know there is a size difference but still can mow at 4mph with the metro. Just thinking out loud fell free to add to it if you like.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-09-2006, 08:39 PM
Bel Air Bob Bel Air Bob is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bel Air, Maryland
Posts: 84
If you're thinking about overhead with a chopper, maybe you aren't charging enough. You won't be saving any money anyway if you by new and sell the Dixie. You always take a bath when selling something you bought new, so that will cancel out any savings. Also, you didn't put size of chopper, I'd assume 60" but then you're going to be slower for sure with a 48" walk behind. Is walk behind w sulky as fast, I don't know, as for me, I ride whenever I can, wether it's on a ztr or stander. Demoed a couple sulkies, didn't care for m myself.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-09-2006, 08:41 PM
CutsForLess's Avatar
CutsForLess CutsForLess is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: East Texas
Posts: 75
Bob thats what im trying to find out is how people like them compared to riding, thanks for the input.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-09-2006, 10:02 PM
Roger Roger is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: McMurray, PA
Posts: 5,806
Here are all kinds of thoughts on this topic, from a very recent thread:

http://www.lawnsite.com/showthread.php?t=160674
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-10-2006, 08:59 AM
topsites topsites is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richmond Virginia
Posts: 21,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutsForLess
Bob thats what im trying to find out is how people like them compared to riding, thanks for the input.
I have a 48" T-bar gear drive Wb with a velke, and a 60" Warrior z.
I find you need the lots to justify the Z, plain and simple (translation: BIG lots, nothing below 3/4 acres need apply lol).

Here's the scoop:
- Riding the Warrior is no more comfortable than the velke. Although the legs are relieved from the strain, now the shock of bumpy lawns (and they're all bumpy lol) gets transferred directly to my spine... It's still work and it still hurts after a day.
- The Warrior eats a TON of fuel and costs 3 times more than the Wb, but the maintenance intervals are spread much further apart (25 hrs for the z, every 8 hrs for the Wb). All in all, the Warrior has to produce more, or it's not even worth loading it up.
- The Wb runs circles around the Warrior in most anything under an acre due to its light weight, the Wb is agile and if slower but consistent, it takes turns at almost the same speed as the straights and it gets deeper into the corners so there is less weed-eating with the Wb as well. That, and with the Warriors weight and its huge rear tires, the Z wastes a LOT of time in the turns. Thus, only in lots approaching an acre in size (40k+ square feet) with some nice straight runs does the Warrior really start to pull ahead, once you get into an acre, the Warrior finishes an acre in 30 minutes double cut vs. the Wb's 40 minutes single cut (around 1 hour double cut), both at full stick.

It's a bit like a Nascar vs. a go-kart: On a big oval track, the Nascar will win every time... But take them on the small circuitous track and the big fast car can't even get around the track, so the go-kart would, if not win, at least place just as decently for much less cost and hassle. It's the same with the Z, in a small lot the Z feels almost as useless as a submarine in a swimming pool.
So, you need the lots for the Z, otherwise it's not worth it, at least not to me, I still use the 48" a LOT, a whole lot.

But, the Z has headlights, it can (and likely soon will) keep cutting past sunset. Ahhh yes it is nice

Last edited by topsites; 10-10-2006 at 09:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-10-2006, 10:23 AM
THEoneandonlyLawnRanger's Avatar
THEoneandonlyLawnRanger THEoneandonlyLawnRanger is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: greeneville TN
Posts: 291
Here is a productivity chart from Scag........Not saying you have to buy scag its just the first one i found on the net...........It will show you how many acres/8hour you can do with each deck size in a rider vs. a WB......On average you can mow 6-8 acres more with a rider with the same size deck as a WB, you just cant go as fast on a WB as you can on a rider......hope this helps

http://www.scag.com/productivity.html
__________________
2004 f150
6x10 trailer
Scag Vride 52"
John Deere 455 Diesel 60"
John Deere JX75 21"
Craftsman 21"
Echo blower/trimmer
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-10-2006, 04:20 PM
Down2EarthLawns's Avatar
Down2EarthLawns Down2EarthLawns is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Spring Hill, Florida
Posts: 191
WB's w/sulke are definitely more versatile than riders are. Especially when you get to tight yards and commercial. They are more agile in turning and you can hop curbs easily with a WB. Both will be a slower solution with a rider. You just have to know your route and what could be most used on it. If you like your WB w/sulke better you know what to do after that. Personally, if you have the means, I think buying the 48" first would be your best option. Use it for one week, then use the 60" the next. Compare the two. If you prefer the 48, sell the chopper and the 26, then get the 36. Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-10-2006, 08:42 PM
fiveoboy01's Avatar
fiveoboy01 fiveoboy01 is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southern WI
Posts: 2,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by THEoneandonlyLawnRanger
Here is a productivity chart from Scag........Not saying you have to buy scag its just the first one i found on the net...........It will show you how many acres/8hour you can do with each deck size in a rider vs. a WB......On average you can mow 6-8 acres more with a rider with the same size deck as a WB, you just cant go as fast on a WB as you can on a rider......hope this helps

http://www.scag.com/productivity.html
Productivity numbers from manufacturers are just that, numbers.

They take the deck width, and multiply it by the machine's top speed to come up with acres/hour. But no one ever mows at top speed all the time. Turning, going around obstacles, slowing down for bumpy or uneven ground, all things that we all run into. And in some situations, I believe a more-agile, lighter, more-stable WB will cut just as much, or even more, square footage as a Z in the same period of time.
__________________
Bill

Originally posted by SLR:
Quote:
you really got off fortunate and lucky 5-0boy1!..imagine if you an her created a little 5boy1,now there's a nicely entangled chaotic toranado vise!
THE VERY BEST SOURCE OF INFO FOR THE GREEN INDUSTRY! ALL YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-12-2006, 12:02 AM
Mr.Mow-It-All's Avatar
Mr.Mow-It-All Mr.Mow-It-All is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Yo Mamma's House
Posts: 509
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutsForLess
I have a dixie chopper that I really like and a 26" exmark for small yards, but I have been thinking of getting a walkbehind. Im wondering if I would like the walkbehind enough to sale the chopper. I like riding on the big lots but I have found out a rider is not a priority most of the time, I think it just adds to your overhead more than anything. My question is can I cut as fast with a walkbehind hydro with a sulky as I can with my chopper? Is the rider worth the added expense, I mean its paid for but I could always sell it if I liked the walkbehind enough. I think I could almost get 2 walkbehinds for a little more than I paid for the chopper, maybe a small one like a 36" and then a 48", what do you think? Another thing is would the hydro be that much faster than my 26" metro I mean I know there is a size difference but still can mow at 4mph with the metro. Just thinking out loud fell free to add to it if you like.
How do you like your exmark 26, I have been thinking of getting a couple of them to replace the toro 21's. I bag more than mulch but like to be able to do both.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-13-2006, 09:06 AM
CutsForLess's Avatar
CutsForLess CutsForLess is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: East Texas
Posts: 75
Mr Mow It I love the 26" metro it has a real good cut and is pretty fast, the only thing I dont like is the weight, I think it is about 160 pounds. It looks to be built very well, the blade is belt drive with the same spindle on it as the big mowers.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM.

Page generated in 0.11060 seconds with 9 queries