Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-17-2007, 09:12 PM
DillonsLawnCare's Avatar
DillonsLawnCare DillonsLawnCare is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brentwood, Tennessee
Posts: 1,100
ive got a belt drive on my 52". i am satisfied with it somewhat. it doesnt pull to well on hills. if your doing alot of turning, then get the hydro. with the hydro you have the capability of the TRUE zero turning radius.(like the riders)
with belt drive you can only go forward, and if your not careful, you'll dig into the grass with the tire when turning. with the hydro, youll reduce that. i test drove my friends hydro exmark 36" viking yesterday on ym grass and i wish i had that mower more than my toro even though i cut acre lots. hydro is more efficient and reliable. belt is just....belt......................idk JMHO
__________________
1997 Ford F-150
-6x12 Trailer w/ Racks
-2009 Scag Wildcat 26hp LC Kawasaki 52" Velocity Plus Deck
-1999 Scag SWZ Hydro Walk-Behind 17hp Kawasaki 52" Deck
-T230 Shindaiwa Trimmer w/ Speed Feed
-223L Husqvarna Trimmer
-Stihl KM110R w/ Long Reach Hedge Trimmer
-EBZ7100 RedMax Blower
-145BT Husqvarna Blower
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-17-2007, 09:22 PM
ed2hess's Avatar
ed2hess ed2hess is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Austin Texas 78727
Posts: 11,608
I assume the yards you are doing are big or you wouldn't be going to the bigger unit. In which case the belt drive would be just fine for mainly straight line stuff. I am assuming Toro makes a good belt drive. The Scag hydro will cost more than twice that amount. Hydro are usually better when there is a lot of turing and backing.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-17-2007, 10:21 PM
cgaengineer's Avatar
cgaengineer cgaengineer is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winder, GA
Posts: 15,777
Hydro is the only way....If you wanna play you gotta pay! With my Toro T2 the more you squeeze the faster it goes, no gears or speed control levers to worry about.
__________________
Georgia Applicator License Number 09102

"A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-17-2007, 10:33 PM
lawnprosteveo's Avatar
lawnprosteveo lawnprosteveo is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 1,933
A hydo will obviously turn alot better. But is it worth the cost. $2250 is a hard deal to pass up IMO....I used gear drive wb's for quite awhile before I ever got into hydros. I still use my first Toro 36 gear wb. They really are low maintenance and reliable.
Just consider if its worth paying at least twice as much for the hydro.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-18-2007, 12:19 AM
pj550v12's Avatar
pj550v12 pj550v12 is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Stratford CT
Posts: 302
I dont think I've ever met some one who has ever converted from a hydro to a belt drive, think of it that way
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-18-2007, 01:37 AM
IHusky's Avatar
IHusky IHusky is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 478
If budget a factor then belt, but if you have the cash, then definately hydro.
__________________
_____________________



stuff
http://www.lawnsite.com/album.php?albumid=184
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-18-2007, 09:24 PM
ha305 ha305 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: east coast
Posts: 68
Do not get rid of the hydro if you do a lot of turning, and hills too. you will regret it immediately.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-18-2007, 09:30 PM
SNAPPER MAN's Avatar
SNAPPER MAN SNAPPER MAN is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,441
I do small yards with alot of manuvaring and some big wide open yards and i use a belt drive and it is easy to use once you learn how to do true zero turns with it. Im 14 and run a belt better than most adults. Its a matter of what ur used to. I have only ever seen one hydro walkebehind here in houston because they are so expensive. Everything is belt.
__________________
Ford and Chevy Trucks
Scag, Exmark, Wright, Toro, Snapper
Echo, Stihl, Shindaiwa
Lesco application equipment




Having employees that enjoy what they are doing and care about quality is what makes happy customers.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-18-2007, 09:38 PM
DillonsLawnCare's Avatar
DillonsLawnCare DillonsLawnCare is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brentwood, Tennessee
Posts: 1,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNAPPER MAN View Post
I do small yards with alot of manuvaring and some big wide open yards and i use a belt drive and it is easy to use once you learn how to do true zero turns with it. Everything is belt.

there is no possible way to do a " true zero turn " with the belt drive. the gearbox is constantly going forward unless you reverse it manually. when turning, one tire stays put and the other one moves. it digs into the grass. i hate my belt drive. id go hydro. pas the offer up. theres many other better deals out there. what ive learned, is that you get what you pay for. youll regret it. dont do it. JMO
__________________
1997 Ford F-150
-6x12 Trailer w/ Racks
-2009 Scag Wildcat 26hp LC Kawasaki 52" Velocity Plus Deck
-1999 Scag SWZ Hydro Walk-Behind 17hp Kawasaki 52" Deck
-T230 Shindaiwa Trimmer w/ Speed Feed
-223L Husqvarna Trimmer
-Stihl KM110R w/ Long Reach Hedge Trimmer
-EBZ7100 RedMax Blower
-145BT Husqvarna Blower
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-18-2007, 09:46 PM
J&T Kiev J&T Kiev is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N.W In.
Posts: 416
If your on a budget a belt drive is a perfectly good machine. However, hydro is a third more productive, and has features absent from a belt drive. {instant true reverse, better maneuverability, no slipping belts in drenching wet working conditions, true Zero turn capability .} Hydro's are the more expensive but a more productive choice. For a primary mower, I wouldn't even consider a belt drive.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 AM.

Page generated in 0.09718 seconds with 9 queries