Advanced Search

The Green Industry's Resource Center

Old 02-10-2002, 01:22 PM
augs dad augs dad is offline
LawnSite Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: harrisburg pa
Posts: 32
1/2 ton v6..enough guts?

Well after hearing your points of view I am leaning towards a 1/2 ton...most likley an f150. Since this is my second career after 20 years in another business, I dont plan to grow beyond a one man show...nor do I want the employee and insurance hassles. That said, I'll only be hauling a 48 or52 rider on a 12ft trailer. Was out kicking tires on new f150's this morning....can buy a new one with 0% financing for 20kcouple$. Some of you have told me the a 2wd v6 will do just fine given my usage. I'd love a 250 or 350 but the initial cost and the fuel cost is a factor I need to consider. Is the v6 2wd a mistake? Thanks again...Gary
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2002, 03:01 PM
Andy Miller Andy Miller is offline
LawnSite Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 28
Yes it Will be a mistake.

I have a Chevy V-6 in a full size 1/2 ton. Lots of truck to pull with V-6. Add a trailer and now you have a serious lack of power. It will do it but you will suffer worst fuel economy than the guy with the V-8. Add other things like the V-8 has heavier duty cooling, transmission, and rear end. I have owned this truck for 5 years. There is never a day that I was not sorry that I had not listened to my friends. I do not know why they put a small motor in a full sized truck. BTW, the resale value is next to nothing. No power and bad gas mileage.
If you want something done, give the job to someone busy!
1997 Chev 1/2
6' x 12' trailer
32" Cub Cadet tractor (1988)
2000 Yazoo/Kees ZTR 48"deck
1998 Lawnboy 21"
3 various Stihl trimmers
Toro 21" Proline
Crapsman wire trimer on wheels
Stihl BG85 blower
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2002, 03:46 PM
John DiMartino John DiMartino is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Walden,NY
Posts: 2,555
The F150 should work well,why not spend the 800 or whatever dollars it costs for the 4.6V8,it is much torquier,and smoother than the 4.2v6,The V8 should pull better,with less strain,and better fuel econmy towing.In addition,when you decide to sell it,the V6 has no reasale,the V8 is easily worth the full price it cost new at resale time,dont believe the books when they tell you to deduct like 300 for a V6,when I used to work at the chryselr dealer,they used to deduct 1000 if the full size truck had a 6 cyl.,no one wated them used,they were very hard to sell.
My Equipment Pictures
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2002, 07:49 PM
CT18fireman CT18fireman is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Brookfield, CT
Posts: 611
With your location I would suggest the extra money for 4wd. Even if you are not plowing getting around in the winter in PA will be a lot easier with a 4wd. I think in the long run the investment will be worth it. If you are going to be the only driver/worker then the truck should last a good amount of time. Good Luck
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2002, 08:17 PM
kerrigan kerrigan is online now
LawnSite Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Port Huron, Michigan
Posts: 33
6cyl f-150

I have a 97 4x4 f-150 with a six cylinder with 240,000 miles on it she's been a worker her whole life. I pull a 16 foot lowboy 4 52 inch walk behind and all other needed equipment. She labors a bit fully loaded with clippings, but it is a good truck. I also plow with it i work it hard and it keeps asking for more. I am real happy with it but I think I am going to get a 3/4 or 1 ton with a dump insert this year.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Layout Style:

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Grand View Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 PM.

Page generated in 0.07846 seconds with 10 queries