Register free!
Search
 
     

Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-20-2000, 01:19 AM
paul paul is offline
Lawnsite Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Chicago,Ill.
Posts: 1,625
I just found out that a job that I turned down last year as un-buildable, has been redesigned. The supplier had their engineers write a job spec without ever going to the site and without soil borings or load tests. They assumed 2500 psf soil bearing capacity, site really had 200 psf bearing. Site was on a hill with 3'-4' of peat and water draining on it from three sides. Below this was a layer of clay about 2' deep then bankrun for the next 10'(I had a testing company go down 16') Now they want me to excavate down to stable soil and with fabric and 3&quot; stone make a base 3' wide to support the wall. My question is what is the peat behind the wall wants to slide? I don't want the job to fail.<br><p>----------<br>paul<br>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-20-2000, 01:28 AM
Lanelle Lanelle is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: No.VA, zone 7
Posts: 1,361
I'd definitely involve a geo-engineer and check into geo-grid type retainments behind the wall. I know there are some other types but I'm not familiar with them. Until an engineer signs off on the design for this one, I'd keep my options open.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-20-2000, 01:54 AM
paul paul is offline
Lawnsite Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Chicago,Ill.
Posts: 1,625
It's a $130K job and I don't want to rebuild it at my expense! Good point.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-22-2000, 08:55 AM
Stonehenge's Avatar
Stonehenge Stonehenge is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,277
Hey Paul - <p>As you know I do more residential than commercial, and the residential is on a smaller scale than yours. In reading this forum, it reminded me of a residential project I bid on but didn't get (nobody got it, they thought it'd cost about half of what the bid was). I met with an engineer to discuss it briefly, just to get some advice. My question is this - When you had those soil tests done on that project, was that on your dime, or did you charge the potential customer? If you charged them, I'd be interested to find out how you work that into a contract. I'm unsure of how to approach something like that. <p>Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-22-2000, 09:23 AM
paul paul is offline
Lawnsite Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Chicago,Ill.
Posts: 1,625
Yes, I droppped the dime and got paid back for it. I use a soil testing service, because it's my company on the line and public works jobs have alot of exposure. If something fails it's my ass. I don't have to write that in my contracts because the specs that the villages give me have that spelled out, if the job was buildable I would have eaten the cost $200-300 isn't bad insurance on a $130K job.<p>----------<br>paul<br>
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-24-2000, 08:31 PM
SLSNursery SLSNursery is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 442
Paul - you are wise to be cautious on a site like this. We don't do work of that scale, but here is what I saw two years ago. Behind a Lowe's (Home improvement store) the engineers pulled the same deal, and a huge wall went up with compaction tests and the whole deal. Simultaneously, I took in about 15000 yards of unusable (wet and silty) fill material from the same site. The stuff locks up like concrete when dry, but is very unstable when wet. This leftover material shifted and blew the wall right out, subsequently we received many triaxle loads of versa-lok block, fill, and the remains of the geo-grid material. I'm not sure who paid (it was very likely the engineer on the project who was liable though). I don't know the dimensions of your project, but in this case the building was done, so the CO was waiting on the wall replacement. On a 130k job I wouldn't want to move a few thousand yards of material after the fact. If an engineer signs off on it try to find out if they worked on a similar project, or if they are just theorizing. Also make sure there is some sort of drainage system. I have a suspicion that lack of proper drainage would make the peat suck in water, then swell and shift unpredictably.<p>PS - I would like to visit you if you are working on one of those lake or river projects. It sounds interesting.<br><p>----------<br>Phil Grande - Soundview Landscape Supply - http://members.aol.com/slsnursery<br>Ivy League Landscaping - http://members.aol.com/scagrider
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-24-2000, 08:41 PM
paul paul is offline
Lawnsite Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Chicago,Ill.
Posts: 1,625
Phil, We are working on the prints for the extention of the Fox River Job (snapped limestone) now, it looks like next year it will go. <br>I talked to the soils man this mourning we turned the job down.<p>----------<br>paul<br>
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2000, 05:19 PM
Lanelle Lanelle is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: No.VA, zone 7
Posts: 1,361
We just had a request to build a two-tiered Keystone wall---on loose clay fill. Total height for the two walls would be approx. 15'l Demanded a design fee because we knew that we'd need an engineer and a good amount of time to get it designed and spec'd properly. Client declined which was fine.<br>If I hadn't read all of these posts we might not have been so cautious. I even told the client about the Lowes job. Guess they think that the bottom line is more important until the wall blows out. Thanks guys. <p>----------<br>Lanelle<br>
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:35 AM.

Page generated in 0.08898 seconds with 9 queries