Register free!

The Green Industry's Resource Center



Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-16-2010, 06:21 AM
SP1000 SP1000 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
NH LS175 or Bobcat220

G'day,

Currently own an NH LS 160 04 model, had some seat sensor problems and not enough power for a few jobs and top boom bushes seem to ware out pretty fast, other than that it's been pretty good. Looking at upgrading to a LS175 current model with pilot controls, or S220. I have only used a 773 and a 420 Case in the past.

Using it for grass slashing, grapple bucket, trencher, post hole digger and pallet forks. Dirt driveway grading. I'll be test driving them in a couple of weeks but would like to know if either have any problems, buying new.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-16-2010, 06:43 AM
nobagger's Avatar
nobagger nobagger is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pa
Posts: 3,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by SP1000 View Post
G'day,

Currently own an NH LS 160 04 model, had some seat sensor problems and not enough power for a few jobs and top boom bushes seem to ware out pretty fast, other than that it's been pretty good. Looking at upgrading to a LS175 current model with pilot controls, or S220. I have only used a 773 and a 420 Case in the past.

Using it for grass slashing, grapple bucket, trencher, post hole digger and pallet forks. Dirt driveway grading. I'll be test driving them in a couple of weeks but would like to know if either have any problems, buying new.
If power is an issue why not just go for an LS 190 or a Bobcat A300? Just saying a LS175 or S220 still dont have a heavy tip load for heavy lifting or huge power. Pilot controls are the way to go in my opinion.
__________________
J and B Lawncare:

On our own as of 2003. Proud to be a full time, legitimate company.

Equipment we use:
Ford trucks
Pro Line and GatorMade trailer's
Gravely, Exmark, Honda and Snapper mower's
Echo trimmer's and blower's
LittleWonder equipment
BillyGoat equipment
New Holland and Dresser loader's (snow removal)
Fisher snow plow's
DownEaster and Fisher salt spreader's
TurboTurf fertilizer tank

http://jandblawncare.net
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-16-2010, 10:37 PM
ksss's Avatar
ksss ksss is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Rigby, Idaho
Posts: 6,977
Try a CASE 440. The Bobcat 220 is their best machine in my opinon but the 440 is more powerful.
__________________
See us at www.kaiserskidsteer.com

Proudly running CASE and Takeuchi equipment.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-16-2010, 10:50 PM
YellowDogSVC's Avatar
YellowDogSVC YellowDogSVC is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 3,550
Bobcat 220 is discontinued (i think). Might be some left in inventory but the s630 is the replacement. you can search for the info on the test results between the 220 and the 630.
__________________

"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid."

Twitter @Cedar_Clearing
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-16-2010, 11:35 PM
KTM KTM is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 475
There kind off 2 diffrent loaders, The N Holland is a vertical path loader, while the Bobcat is a radial path. The S250 is the vertical path version of the s220. If your using your machine for material moving, you want vertical, digging you tend to want radial. Both are proven and great machines, although I would think that you would have to go one step bigger than the 175 to lift the same as the 220 or 250. i could be wrong though.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-17-2010, 12:06 AM
Duffster's Avatar
Duffster Duffster is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by KTM View Post
If your using your machine for material moving, you want vertical, digging you tend to want radial.
Can you explain that to me/us.

I have heard this from several people and for the life of me can't figure out what the heck difference it would make.

I have asked other people in the past but they really didn't know.

Thanks.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Oomkes
Your argument falls flatter than a 3 day old roadkill squirrel.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-17-2010, 12:06 AM
stuvecorp's Avatar
stuvecorp stuvecorp is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: lake wissota, wi
Posts: 5,158
I had a 665 and 170 and they do have a warm spot in my heart. I think they are an 'overachieving' machine. The 175 has a touch more power but still is lacking. I went with a 440 and while heavier and a bit bigger footprint has been way more productive for me.
__________________
Do or do not. There is no try. yoda
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-17-2010, 12:18 AM
Tigerotor77W Tigerotor77W is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffster View Post
Can you explain that to me/us.

I have heard this from several people and for the life of me can't figure out what the heck difference it would make.

I have asked other people in the past but they really didn't know.

Thanks.
There's some discussion that vertical lift machines have more bushings/pins than radial. This means more wear points but also greater potential for slop, but given how tight manufacturers have begun making their vertical machines, I think it's become more of whether you plan to do a lot of truck loading or just some 6' tops dirt work.

One reason it *does* make sense to go radial for dirt moving is that the load moves away from you as you lift up, so dumping a load (into a small pile) is easier -- you don't have to drive up on the pile to get the load away from the machine. (This is especially true for Deere and NH designs, but less so for Cat and Bobcat.)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-17-2010, 09:36 AM
SP1000 SP1000 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
Thanks for all your input.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-17-2010, 09:53 AM
AEL's Avatar
AEL AEL is online now
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by nobagger View Post
If power is an issue why not just go for an LS 190 or a Bobcat A300? Just saying a LS175 or S220 still dont have a heavy tip load for heavy lifting or huge power. Pilot controls are the way to go in my opinion.
I wouldnt really throw a A300 in the mix, as it is an all wheel steer machine as aposed to the newholland . Bobcat S250's are one of there best machines in my opinion. Company i used to be partnered with had 2 of them (one with pilot controls, one with hand and foot) and besides one or two small simple fixes, they both were realiable work horses. When i left the one had 3300 hrs, and the other 2600 i believe.
__________________
Sean

A.E.L

Land Clearing, Grinding services, Mulch Production, Excavating, Grading

Check out our new YouTube account!
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWI...YEpKMXUcrB1jBw
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM.

Page generated in 0.09826 seconds with 9 queries