Register free!


Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #81  
Old 01-18-2011, 09:56 PM
Tim Wilson Tim Wilson is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 797
Quote:
Mainly because some well published people have, in my view, spread inaccurate information.
Who might that be? Please read the beginnings of this thread again to see who first brought up salts.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 01-24-2011, 10:01 AM
PJC PJC is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rowley, MA
Posts: 2
When we provided residential organic fertilization services we took an all or nothing approach. We never found the need for the use of “bridge” products. We now manufacture and distribute an all natural organic fertilizer and soil amendments. Our customers represent 1,000s of organically maintained lawns and athletic fields in the Northeast that are being done without the use of synthetic fertilizers or pesticides.

If you plan on using even some synthetics and pesticides than it’s not an organic program and you shouldn’t advertise it to your clients that way. If from a comfort level you feel you need to do it then my suggestion would be to only spot-treat and then apply an all natural organic fertilizer and/or vermicompost top-dress to encourage the soil biology out of its dormancy.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 01-25-2011, 06:24 PM
JDUtah's Avatar
JDUtah JDUtah is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UT
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smallaxe View Post
See what I mean... To me it looks like those salts were dissolved and settled into the low spot in one picture, and acroos the top of the other field entirely.
Where were those pictures taken and is it really salt??
Smallaxe. I bet it is salt. What people didn't catch is how it probably accumulated. Kiril mentioned it, but in a way that went well over most readers heads I am sure.

Last edited by JDUtah; 01-25-2011 at 06:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 01-25-2011, 07:22 PM
ICT Bill ICT Bill is offline
LawnSite Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Howard County MD
Posts: 4,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJC View Post
When we provided residential organic fertilization services we took an all or nothing approach. We never found the need for the use of “bridge” products. We now manufacture and distribute an all natural organic fertilizer and soil amendments. Our customers represent 1,000s of organically maintained lawns and athletic fields in the Northeast that are being done without the use of synthetic fertilizers or pesticides.

If you plan on using even some synthetics and pesticides than it’s not an organic program and you shouldn’t advertise it to your clients that way. If from a comfort level you feel you need to do it then my suggestion would be to only spot-treat and then apply an all natural organic fertilizer and/or vermicompost top-dress to encourage the soil biology out of its dormancy.
PJC welcome to the site, we are glad you are here

great input, are you guys applicators or just distribute products or both it sounds like you have some background in this
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 01-26-2011, 02:43 PM
PJC PJC is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rowley, MA
Posts: 2
We started roughly ten years ago providing organic fertilization services. We purchased the manufacturing rights for an all natural organic fertilizer that has been around since 1994 in 2008.

We have since sold our service business to focus on the manufacture and distribution of our all natural fertilizer and soil amendments.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 01-26-2011, 09:06 PM
Tim Wilson Tim Wilson is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 797
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJC View Post
When we provided residential organic fertilization services we took an all or nothing approach. We never found the need for the use of “bridge” products. We now manufacture and distribute an all natural organic fertilizer and soil amendments. Our customers represent 1,000s of organically maintained lawns and athletic fields in the Northeast that are being done without the use of synthetic fertilizers or pesticides.

If you plan on using even some synthetics and pesticides than it’s not an organic program and you shouldn’t advertise it to your clients that way. If from a comfort level you feel you need to do it then my suggestion would be to only spot-treat and then apply an all natural organic fertilizer and/or vermicompost top-dress to encourage the soil biology out of its dormancy.
Give this man a cigar or gold star or both!
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:18 PM
quackgrass quackgrass is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North West
Posts: 247
All or nothing.....

I choose to use both so that I can minimize the total amount of nutrient input.

Most plants have a nutrient demand curve that spikes up during certain parts of the season and also subsides during other times. It is nearly impossible to match this curve with synthetics because they release and disappear too rapidly. It is also hard to follow the curve with just organics because they release slowly and one would have to apply an abundance to meet peak demand which is costly and excess during times of low nutrient demand.

Now imagine you take an average of that curve over the growing season and we can simply call that "baseline fertility". It really is way more scientific than that but I would like to include everyone in this conversation not just the holier than tho.

I believe the baseline fertility needs of a plant are best served organically because its stable, and gets the soil active. But mostly it means that you can apply organic applications at the same cost as synthetic ones because the rates are lower.

The next step is to hit the growth spikes with a low rate of synthetic fertilizer. The synthetic nutrients are able to be rapidly released and absorbed by the plant during these narrow windows of peak nutrient demand.

So in the end, you use a 1/2 rate of organic fertilizer and a 1/4 rate of synthetic fertilizer to accomplish optimum growth with less nutrients and money.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 01-31-2011, 10:58 PM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,318
Are we growing crops or landscapes? IMO, there is absolutely no need to manage nutrients for landscape plants to provide for optimum growth. The goal is to maintain plant health and aesthetic quality, neither of which require nutrients at levels of luxury consumption. In fact, I do the opposite .... I manage landscapes to limit growth while maintaining plant health and aesthetics.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 02-01-2011, 12:33 PM
quackgrass quackgrass is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North West
Posts: 247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiril View Post
Are we growing crops or landscapes?
I think its an excellent idea to grow crops in your landscape, but this type of nutrient management lends itself perfectly for edible and non edible plants.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiril View Post
IMO, there is absolutely no need to manage nutrients for landscape plants to provide for optimum growth.
Really? Optimum means must favorable, not most growth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiril View Post
The goal is to maintain plant health and aesthetic quality, neither of which require nutrients at levels of luxury consumption.
Right, that would be optimum, and to do that you would want to use the least amount of nutrients possible. Fertilizing in the manor I described is a great way to insure you don't encourage luxury consumption.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 02-01-2011, 01:05 PM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by quackgrass View Post
Really? Optimum means must favorable, not most growth.
Yes .... really. I intentionally stress plants ..... "optimum growth" suggests providing conditions which do not lead to stress ..... i.e. no shortage of nutrients or water.

Quote:
Originally Posted by quackgrass View Post
Right, that would be optimum, and to do that you would want to use the least amount of nutrients possible. Fertilizing in the manor I described is a great way to insure you don't encourage luxury consumption.
I'm not following you here given it is very unlikely you (or anyone else) has the data necessary to make this determination. I don't believe in blanket assumptions, nor do I believe that synthetics are generally necessary in your typical properly managed landscape .... particularly in non-turf areas. IMO, if you want to minimize inputs you need to find the breaking point of your landscape plants, then maintain your resources at a level that is slightly higher than that (i.e. one that doesn't impose too much stress on the plants).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
fertilizer , organic , synthetic

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.com™ - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 AM.

Page generated in 0.11156 seconds with 10 queries