Register free!


Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-16-2012, 12:24 PM
David W's Avatar
David W David W is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 259
Topdressing peat vs. compost

Anyone have experience topdressing with peat? Any benefits over compost either in the biology or maybe it's easier to spread through topdresser ???? I'm curious on this subject.

I came across this company Peat Inc. out of MN. http://www.peatinc.com/ Curious to see what you think the pros and cons would on the two.

Feedback would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2012, 12:56 PM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,318
Compost is sustainable, which IMO is the only factor worth considering between the two.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-16-2012, 06:30 PM
dKoester's Avatar
dKoester dKoester is online now
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: yummytown
Posts: 2,928
Use peat for blueberries. Its PH is very low. I would not use it on lawns. On lawns compost is the way to go but you do not want to put too much. With too much you can get out of balance with your potassium to calcium ratio and phosphorus to calcium ratio.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-17-2012, 09:46 AM
phasthound's Avatar
phasthound phasthound is online now
LawnSite Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mt. Laurel, NJ
Posts: 4,097
Compost wins every time.
__________________
Barry Draycott

The nation that destroys its soil destroys itself.
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 PM.

Page generated in 0.06242 seconds with 9 queries