Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 06-30-2012, 06:14 PM
BJWLAWNCARE's Avatar
BJWLAWNCARE BJWLAWNCARE is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Scranton PA
Posts: 395
I personally would have a tough time going from a 250 to a 150. You may save gas but everything else is smaller. The brakes, axles, etc. You may run into problems down the road with repairs.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-30-2012, 10:22 PM
jkilov's Avatar
jkilov jkilov is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: MS
Posts: 1,348
My bad I meant 8000+ lbs GCWR not GVWR, anyway the colorado is out, I need that 8' bed for volume not so much the weight itself.

The biggest limitation is probably hitch load, noticed when the trailer isn't level loaded the truck's rear is all over the place.

Last year I accumulated well over 20,000 miles, this economy thing has me going much further for business than usual so good mpg's are important. Since I service the truck myself once outside warranty I prefer clean simple engineering.

More importantly I'm demoing a 1500 4.7 V8 Ram next week, it's not on my list but I refuse to discard any option before actually driving it.
__________________
F-250 5.4 V8 stand. cab, tandem trailer
Ferris IS3100Z 61" L Kaw, Hydrocut 36" 13hp Kaw
Shindaiwa T3410, EB8520 Maruyama HT2300, MS047
Stihl FC85, MS192T, 041AV, MS200
Redmax HBZ2601

Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-30-2012, 10:27 PM
excav8ter excav8ter is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 189
What are you expecting to see as far as MPG goes? I have hard time believing that a gas engine is going to deliver good MPG's while being good at towing. I work with many guys who have gas engines in their trucks, and they do poorly in the MPG department.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-01-2012, 05:47 PM
White Gardens's Avatar
White Gardens White Gardens is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bloomington IL
Posts: 6,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriot Services View Post
I wish Ford had continued pursuing diesel tech for the F150 and now defunct Rangers. I think any V6 is going to too stressed under daily towing operations. The 5.0 is probably going to the most popular option.
Posted via Mobile Device
That's my biggest gripe. If the 1500 or F-150 had a small diesel in it, I'd be all over it in a heartbeat.

If I ever become successful enough to where I have money to blow, I'll be importing an F-150 Diesel from Europe.

.......
__________________
White Gardens On Facebook.......WG Thread......Greencare For Troops......... mywhitegardens.com(under construction)

2005- Completion of University of Illinois Master Gardner's Program.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-01-2012, 05:58 PM
hosejockey2002's Avatar
hosejockey2002 hosejockey2002 is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 1,194
It will be interesting to see how well the Ford Ecoboost holds up in the long run. People will say that there is no way a V6 will hold up to heavy towing, but not many years ago guys would have said the same thing about a diesel engine producing 1 hp per cubic inch, which is almost exactly what modern pickup diesels produce.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-01-2012, 08:50 PM
Patriot Services's Avatar
Patriot Services Patriot Services is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 8,541
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Gardens View Post
That's my biggest gripe. If the 1500 or F-150 had a small diesel in it, I'd be all over it in a heartbeat.

If I ever become successful enough to where I have money to blow, I'll be importing an F-150 Diesel from Europe.

.......
I wish it was easier to import vehicles. There are a bunch of more powerful, more efficient options from around the world. But thanks to the EPA and ignorant consumers we will never have them. If they based emissions on economy there wouldn't be any arguement.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-22-2012, 10:07 PM
jkilov's Avatar
jkilov jkilov is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: MS
Posts: 1,348
OK finally demoed the dodge and it's ... suprisingly good.

Ride quality is very smooth and stable. I don't think it would tow as good as the ford, chassis wise it just seem to flex a tad in the corner, though being unloaded I couldn't give it a real test.

Economy wasn't that bad, again for the short distance and unloaded I can't really say but got 15 mpg fat the test which isn't that bad for a V8, apparently there's a V6 available on some gutted models, albeit only a 4-speed, I may look into those.

The biggest surprise is just how quiet this truck is, at 50 mph road noise is hardly audible, one could really get use to that. The "Ram-box" is a very nice feature, I definitively want one of these.

Biggest complaint would be fit and finish, the SLT tested felt kinda cheap with the lower trims even worse, I guess you get what you pay for.

To summarize quite a decent truck, any feedback on long-term reliability would be very appreciated.
__________________
F-250 5.4 V8 stand. cab, tandem trailer
Ferris IS3100Z 61" L Kaw, Hydrocut 36" 13hp Kaw
Shindaiwa T3410, EB8520 Maruyama HT2300, MS047
Stihl FC85, MS192T, 041AV, MS200
Redmax HBZ2601

Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-22-2012, 10:42 PM
SouthLouisianaGrassCutter SouthLouisianaGrassCutter is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 37
What is the price range you are looking into?

My vote is for a 2000 to 2002 F-250 with the 7.3L

BTW That 4.7l dodge you drove. hook it to a trailer and it will get 10 MPG or less.

My 7.3 got 13-15 mpg towing. Truck and trailer weighed 15,000lbs that is an in-closed trailer. 18-20 MPG unloaded
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-23-2012, 09:51 PM
JCA1 JCA1 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Roanoke Rapids NC
Posts: 100
If Ford no longer offers it, could you find a slightly older F-150 with the 4.2 V6?
__________________
It's OK to try and fail.....but never give up.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-24-2012, 12:29 AM
RSK Property Maintenance's Avatar
RSK Property Maintenance RSK Property Maintenance is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Manchester,CT
Posts: 1,452
i read your original post, and from experience i would say go with something a little older, like an 01-03 7.3 f350 diesel, because while you may not need that much towing capacity now you probably will down the road, if your looking to grow, which i would think everyone is. I bought an f350 last year and started advertising and now a little over a year later, i'm looking into f450 dump trucks.....and will probably end up buying one before the winter hits, always buy more then you need, you will either grow into it or end up using it to its full capabilities and wishing you went bigger eventually. i know i always do.....
__________________
fully lic. and ins. 10yrs exp.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 AM.

Page generated in 0.08016 seconds with 9 queries