|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
why not? most systems here are poly main
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
If the pipe is rated for the pressure, and is NSF tubing, it isn't a technical fail, but unless you have hose bibs on the main line, there's no reason for it. Master valve first, then a poly mainline (and a de-pressurized poly mainline can be utility-grade tubing)
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was just giving Eddie a hard time. I use poly for mains too but some don't agree.
Posted via Mobile Device |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Non-NSF poly does not make good mains
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
i looked at a job site for next year today, pics of the property from the corners, existing structure (outside and under side) located lines and tank with my voodoo sticks. pretty much got a picture of the whole layout, when the plans come out, bidding is cake.
here's a hint ed, you're over the tank when the rod(s) spin in a circle. have fun
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Same here, no problems.
__________________
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
I still don't see what the few inches of poly between the manifold and the supply accomplishes that a sch 80 union doesn't accomplish more reliably.
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't think I'd put that in my resume.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
















Linear Mode
