Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-13-2013, 11:23 PM
makktruck's Avatar
makktruck makktruck is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 134
Toro Grandstand or Scag V-Ride

I've done the research but i want to hear from people who have had experience with both of these machines. If it makes a difference im going with a 52 deck size and have a 36inch Scag Belt drive. I will need to be able to handle hills and mow in wet conditions. Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-14-2013, 09:11 AM
lawnkingforever's Avatar
lawnkingforever lawnkingforever is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,188
I own a grandstand and have run one for 2 years as my primary mower. There has been countless threads on how standers handles hills. Many say they will mow hills well. I am not buying in. What constitutes a hill is very subjective. Where I live hills are part of the deal, steep and gradual inclines are existent on most yards. Since I switched to a stander, I find myself using a pushmower more often on steeper terrain where my grandstand would damage the turf or not be able to mow at all. Why I like my grandstand over a wb w/sulky is the fatigue factor and less of a footprint on my trailer and for storage purposes. It also has more ground speed and more agile in tight spaces. If hills and mowing in wet conditions are a major concern though, I would take my ferris wb over my grandstand.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-14-2013, 09:52 AM
sjessen sjessen is online now
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Knoxville, Tn
Posts: 1,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawnkingforever View Post
I own a grandstand and have run one for 2 years as my primary mower. There has been countless threads on how standers handles hills. Many say they will mow hills well. I am not buying in. What constitutes a hill is very subjective. Where I live hills are part of the deal, steep and gradual inclines are existent on most yards. Since I switched to a stander, I find myself using a pushmower more often on steeper terrain where my grandstand would damage the turf or not be able to mow at all. Why I like my grandstand over a wb w/sulky is the fatigue factor and less of a footprint on my trailer and for storage purposes. It also has more ground speed and more agile in tight spaces. If hills and mowing in wet conditions are a major concern though, I would take my ferris wb over my grandstand.
Posted via Mobile Device
Agreed. At the end of the week I am a bit faster with a 60" wb vs a 60" stander. Hills are an issue here as well. Standers are a good bit heavier than wbs and will cause more rutting/ tearing. Think of a stander as a rider you stand on.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-14-2013, 07:45 PM
Rvldesign Rvldesign is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Little Rock, Ar
Posts: 189
i have a 36" vride right now and it is amazing. while the other two post said they couldn't mow hills i was able to drive mine up and down any hill i could find with very little problems. i was also able to go across come but if it was too steep then it could become very difficult to maneuver. i also demoed the 61" vride this summer and it was just as amazing. i am also looking into getting a 52" vride this year and am pretty much sold on it. i have had 0 problems out of my vride with almost 200 hours on it. i would highly recommend the vride but if for some reason you got the 36" you will want to change the tires to the ones like planetscapes talks about in his posts on here. good luck on your new purchase.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-14-2013, 07:49 PM
Rvldesign Rvldesign is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Little Rock, Ar
Posts: 189
also i ran scags mulching blades with just the discharge plate instead of the entire mulch kit. when compared to a buddys mower who had it the clippings were a hair smaller but didn't effect it and was a few hundred dollars cheaper. wet grass never caused us to bog down or anything either with the 36" or 61" vrides.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 AM.

Page generated in 0.06896 seconds with 9 queries