Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #871  
Old 01-30-2013, 01:25 PM
PapaD PapaD is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Warrington, PA
Posts: 32
A local Bucks County, PA School District received their offer from DuPont and has asked for an extension so that they can obtain more info about long term effects of Imprelis. Here are the links to the two stories that have been in the local newspaper.

http://www.phillyburbs.com/my_town/n...eb39460c1.html

http://www.phillyburbs.com/my_town/n...d44fc379a.html
Reply With Quote
  #872  
Old 01-30-2013, 02:07 PM
TreeNut TreeNut is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 80
Interesting information

Thank you for posting that, PapaD---I agree with the school board, in that the offered settlement isn't near enough. I'm not sure why, however, they didn't do their homework earlier--they must have trusted DuPont to "do the right thing."
Reply With Quote
  #873  
Old 02-07-2013, 08:21 AM
Starbuy Starbuy is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Summit County, Ohio
Posts: 335
I keep reading reports that supposedly quote DuPont saying that Imprelis "poses minimal risks to humans and pets." Is anyone else somewhat concerned about that statement besides me? Why can't they say "poses NO risk"? Did the label on the Imprelis bottles instruct that people spraying this should wear protective gloves, boots and so forth? I wonder why. I'm not trying to be an alarmist, but simply inquiring. I'm living with this mess and have a right to be concerned.
Reply With Quote
  #874  
Old 02-07-2013, 10:33 AM
rosewater rosewater is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SALINE
Posts: 63
Be afraid...these are the same folks that defend, delay and deny. why would I believe anything they say at this stage of the game
Reply With Quote
  #875  
Old 02-07-2013, 11:00 AM
cindyb's Avatar
cindyb cindyb is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: KY
Posts: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starbuy View Post
I keep reading reports that supposedly quote DuPont saying that Imprelis "poses minimal risks to humans and pets." Is anyone else somewhat concerned about that statement besides me? Why can't they say "poses NO risk"? Did the label on the Imprelis bottles instruct that people spraying this should wear protective gloves, boots and so forth? I wonder why. I'm not trying to be an alarmist, but simply inquiring. I'm living with this mess and have a right to be concerned.
They also said it was environmentally friendly.

That is one of the many reasons I chose an attorney. I couldn't see Dupont walking away with no responsibility if I signed their agreement.
Reply With Quote
  #876  
Old 02-13-2013, 11:07 AM
Ubetit Ubetit is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lewis Center, OH
Posts: 39
So it looks like the class action settlement was signed off on by the judge at least.
Reply With Quote
  #877  
Old 02-13-2013, 03:21 PM
rosewater rosewater is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SALINE
Posts: 63
Interesting reading but somewhat disappointing...

Judge approves DuPont settlement of herbicide lawsuits | Reuters
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...pont-lawsuits-..
Reply With Quote
  #878  
Old 02-13-2013, 08:47 PM
michiman michiman is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by PapaD View Post
A local Bucks County, PA School District received their offer from DuPont and has asked for an extension so that they can obtain more info about long term effects of Imprelis. Here are the links to the two stories that have been in the local newspaper.
Hey PapaD,

Did you ever see your CRA?

Last week we had a UPS envelope show up at the house. I had my wife rip it open and read the good news...

Dupont sent us a two page denial due to the "fact" that they had no spray records from my LCO. I know he had sent them since they had my name, address and LCO on my first contact with the 800 claims number. Once I blew a gasket on the phone with one of the telephone employees. I regained my composure and called my LCO - he sent me an electronic record of service.

One more call and some conversation with a helpful representative lead me to avoid sending snail mail and email the records directly to Dupont/EPIQ. During my call yesterday, I was told the claim is reopened and processing is being continued. I've been told by several people, the claim should be near finalization.

I avoided a knee-jerk reaction to ship the contingency fee retainer agreement off the the lawyer I have been talking with. I'll try and let the final chapter of the resolution process play out.

Last edited by michiman; 02-13-2013 at 08:51 PM. Reason: quote problem
Reply With Quote
  #879  
Old 02-15-2013, 12:23 PM
PapaD PapaD is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Warrington, PA
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiman View Post
Hey PapaD,

Did you ever see your CRA?

Last week we had a UPS envelope show up at the house. I had my wife rip it open and read the good news...

Dupont sent us a two page denial due to the "fact" that they had no spray records from my LCO. I know he had sent them since they had my name, address and LCO on my first contact with the 800 claims number. Once I blew a gasket on the phone with one of the telephone employees. I regained my composure and called my LCO - he sent me an electronic record of service.

One more call and some conversation with a helpful representative lead me to avoid sending snail mail and email the records directly to Dupont/EPIQ. During my call yesterday, I was told the claim is reopened and processing is being continued. I've been told by several people, the claim should be near finalization.

I avoided a knee-jerk reaction to ship the contingency fee retainer agreement off the the lawyer I have been talking with. I'll try and let the final chapter of the resolution process play out.
Still waiting. I called last week and was told that the CRA was being drafted, which seems like a step backwards since I had previously been told that the draft had been done and sent to Legal. No real answer for the change as she "was just reading from the file record on the computer".

Then, yesterday, I got a note from our management company that they knew a LCO that was dealing with DuPont on a lot of cases and they asked them to check on ours and 2 other properties that they manage. The response was that additional documentation on tree ownership was recently requested from the Association and once that information is received, the claim can move forward.

As my previous narrative mentioned, this information was emailed to them in October (they could not find that email), faxed to them in November (they could not find that fax) and re-faxed to them on 1/4/2013. I did get 2 confirmations from them that they did receive that fax.

So, a month and a half later, the inside source says that they are waiting for this information. I am resigned that we will be part of the class action suit and will get our money that way. I no longer have any expectation that we will ever see a CRA directly from DuPont.
Reply With Quote
  #880  
Old 02-15-2013, 12:38 PM
PapaD PapaD is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Warrington, PA
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosewater View Post
Interesting reading but somewhat disappointing...

Judge approves DuPont settlement of herbicide lawsuits | Reuters
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...pont-lawsuits-..
rosewater, I am curious about your comment. From what I have seen, the proposed settlement states that:
Members of the Property Owners Class will receive a warranty on replacement trees, with the warranty expiring on May 31, 2015. Should Class Members disagree with the settlement amount offered, they may appeal their offer to a panel of arborists. Finally, Property Owner Class Members will not be releasing any claims for environmental or personal injury damages by participating in the settlement.
I know there are some other issues, but to me, these were some of the more objectionable parts of the standard DuPont CRA. I highly doubt that DuPont will do any better for individual suits without a long drawn out court case and decision by a judge or jury. At this point, I am leaning heavily to accepting the proposed settlement rather than waiting another 3 to 5 years for money, especially when I think that it is quite possible that that result will be no better than the proposed settlement agreement.

I would be interested in your thoughts and the thoughts of others.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 PM.

Page generated in 0.09943 seconds with 10 queries