Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-25-2013, 11:13 PM
mkwl's Avatar
mkwl mkwl is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,704
Nice- what did the C/C run you?
__________________
Matt Koski Landscape and Design, LLC
2006 GMC 2500HD 4x4, DMAX/ALLISON Fisher 8' Plow
2003 GMC 2500HD 4x4, 6.0L Fisher 8' Plow
2012 GMC 3500HD 4x4, DMAX/Allison- 9' Mason Dump

Bobcat MT-52 mini skidsteer
Scag V-Ride 52"/26
Scag 36"/15
Bob-Cat 48"/15
Toro 36"/13
Toro 21"
LW 27HP Truck Loader
Fradan 18HP S/P Blower
Red Max Trimmers & Blowers
Stihl chainsaws

American Hauler 8 x18 Enclosed
Carry-on 6 x12 Enclosed
Starlite 6.5 x 16 Open
Bri-Mar 6 x 10 Dump
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-25-2013, 11:25 PM
Woodman1's Avatar
Woodman1 Woodman1 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Eastern SC
Posts: 229
I will have to double check the numbers because I am trading and adding this and that, but with the emergency equip package included 43 I THINK. Don't hold me to that exactly though.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-25-2013, 11:41 PM
360ci 360ci is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 983
Dodge diesels in the 4500 and 5500 models also use urea, like Ford and GM. The Ford F650/750 with the 6.7L Cummins I6 also uses urea injection. They might have the 6.4L V8 TD in those trucks now though.

The 4500/5500 trucks and their 4.44/4.88 axle ratios will eat more fuel, have more expensive tires to replace, and have a harsher ride. If you don't need the payload capacity or front gross axle weight rating for a huge plow, stick with the 3500 series. I'm not sure if Ford still uses the V10 gas in the 4500/5500, but for an everyday hauler it might be worth looking into if you can eat the 6-8mpg. The F350 can be had with the 6.2L V8, but if you want to stick with GM and a gas engine, the 3500 GM is hard to ignore as I find GM is the best of the big3 with ride quality.

I'm in the market and am considering a RAM 3500 dually chassis. Dodge makes the only HD truck with a manual transmission (diesel only). So it has my attention on that alone.

All gas trucks over 10K gross are de-tuned for long term reliability. As an example a GM 3500 with the 6L V8 puts out 322hp, over the 360hp of the 2500 truck with the same engine. Torque remains the same, at the same rpm, go figure that one.

I find it hard to justify the cost of a diesel from Ford or GM based on the fact that they want $12K+ for the diesel and automatic transmission option. The Dodge diesel might not have the torque numbers with the manual, but is $4K less here in Canada.

I buy trucks for the long term, so I do my homework on part costs, labour, tire cost, servicing cost, etc. Some services I can axe out as I can do those myself. For 60K miles (Canadian dollars here folks), Dodge came in first place with the diesel, last in the gas engine. GM Came in the middle for diesel, and 1st in gas engine costs. Ford came in with highest costs for the diesel and in the middle for gas engine costs. The only thing that Cummins asks is to check valve lash (I believe) at around 40K in order to be covered for the duration of the warranty, etc. I don't tow excessively and the diesel manual transmission combo with the 3.73 gears (highest available in Canada) can tow just over 13K, which is nearly 3 tons more than I really need, but it's room to grow.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-26-2013, 11:37 AM
gallihergreen's Avatar
gallihergreen gallihergreen is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Research Triangle, NC
Posts: 2,712
If you're considering a 4500/5500 series truck, check out the International TerraStar too. As for what Kelly said, the commercial/fleet sales manager at my local Chevy dealer said the new 4500/5500 GM is all but a done deal. But even if what you said about Obummer is true, he and the liberals in the Senate will be gone in 2016 when the American people get tired of his class warfare/job killing agenda anyway.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-26-2013, 11:43 AM
Woodman1's Avatar
Woodman1 Woodman1 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Eastern SC
Posts: 229
Gallihergreen - let's hope we can make it that long!!!
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-26-2013, 11:46 AM
gallihergreen's Avatar
gallihergreen gallihergreen is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Research Triangle, NC
Posts: 2,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodman1 View Post
Gallihergreen - let's hope we can make it that long!!!
Posted via Mobile Device
We'll be alright.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-26-2013, 12:47 PM
hosejockey2002's Avatar
hosejockey2002 hosejockey2002 is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 1,187
No good comparison in weight hauling capacity from a 3500 series to a true (not pickup) 450/4500 series. So even if you are a die hard GM guy GM is not an option for you unless you want to sacrifice big-time payload. Those mason dumps are heavy! Figure each truck will weigh about 10K unloaded. So you get either 3300 or 6000 pounds of payload. That's a no-brainer. In fact if I were going to get a little mason dump I'd go right to the 550/5500. Truck costs a little more and weighs a little more but then you can get a payload of closer to 8000 pounds. You can almost do real work with that.

On the gas vs. diesel, these days that's tough. Ford still uses the Triton V10, a tried and true engine. With diesel emissions garbage these days, the gas engine will almost certainly give you less headaches and cost you less in repairs. That said, diesel will give you better mileage so you will get fuel less often. Not saying you will save money though. A diesel will really shine when hauling heavy and towing at the same time. That's what these motors are made to do. I'd drive both and think long and hard if you are going with Ford.

The other guys did well to bring up the Ram, or Dodge, or whatever-they-call-themselves this week 4500 series. I would give them strong consideration. No gas option with Ram, as everybody knows they use the Cummins B series engine, of which there are probably about 100,000,000 of them in use around the world in countless applications. They also use an Aisin-sourced transmission. Aisin builds transmissions for Isuzu and other Japanese trucks, and have a great reputation.

So I would do your homework. In my opinion brand loyalty has no place in buying a truck for commercial use. Keep an open mind and while it's always good to keep others opinions in mind, they are all worth what they cost you (which of course is nothing), find the truck that you like and will suit the needs of your business.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-26-2013, 01:59 PM
Kelly's Landscaping's Avatar
Kelly's Landscaping Kelly's Landscaping is online now
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Milford CT
Posts: 3,546
Another feature of the Ram 4500s that can not be over looked is fuel tank size. 52 gallons is a lot of diesel. I get 550-900 miles on a tank aren't too many guys here that can say that.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-26-2013, 03:44 PM
Pietro's Avatar
Pietro Pietro is online now
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 819
Id search for an older (pre emission) diesel dump. Try to find a ford with the 7.3 or a Dmax/Allison. I was amazed when I searched craigslist in the southern states. They had a lot of 4x4 dump trucks and they were all clean, 0 rust, and decently priced. New trucks are awesome, but new truck payments SUCK! One day I will need a new to me truck, and Im prob going to be going down south to get it.
__________________
Pete
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-31-2013, 07:03 AM
GallucciLandscaping GallucciLandscaping is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Murrysville, PA
Posts: 68
Does anyone have reports of the mileage to be expected out of the ford v10 gasser?

As nice as the diesel is for power, these darn emissions have sure ycaused some problems for guys in my area. Add to that, the mileage from today's diesels aren't that of the older ones (fuel mileage that is)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 AM.

Page generated in 0.07774 seconds with 9 queries