Register free!


Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-04-2013, 02:34 PM
BLC1 BLC1 is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 661
Mulching pellets / Water retention / Seed starter

What are you guys using? I have seen penn mulch and a couple others. Just trying to determine if there is much different in all of them.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-05-2013, 09:29 PM
Smallaxe Smallaxe is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 9,981
It is going to depend on the water retention ability of the soilat hand... it will also have variable degrees of usefullness depending on the material you'll want to grow in it...

What is it about "Penn Mulch" that makes it the focal point of this thread???
__________________
*
Now that I know that clay's texture(platelets) has nothing to do with water infiltration, percolation, or drainage
,,, I wonder what does...
*
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-06-2013, 10:44 AM
RigglePLC's Avatar
RigglePLC RigglePLC is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Grand Rapids MI
Posts: 9,557
Good question, which is best? For seeding--for overseeding: No soil prep? Penn mulch? Slit seeding? Double aeration? Double seed rate? Topdress? Compost? Straw? Hydromulch?

Would you mind? Try them all as a comparison, then tell us what happened. Get photos.

OK maybe I can try a few of these on bare soil in tiny little flower pots. Full scale tests with side by side comparisons would be a major research project. Thinking-suggestions welcome.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 AM.

Page generated in 0.06416 seconds with 9 queries