Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2013, 08:21 PM
IRRITECH's Avatar
IRRITECH IRRITECH is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ATLANTA, GA
Posts: 931
Exmark 48" turf tracer S-Series cutting height

Brand new turf tracer cuts 1/2" high. The blade tip at 12:00 is 1/2" higher than the set height. Took it back to the dealer and after having it for a week said that the 1/2" difference is within exmark's tolerance. Called exmark tech support and after taking several measurements, they don't know either. Tires are right, back supports are all the way up, rake is 1/8" ( which exmark says is correct). Anyone had this problem?
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-02-2013, 07:30 PM
IRRITECH's Avatar
IRRITECH IRRITECH is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ATLANTA, GA
Posts: 931
So either no one has ever had this problem or no one has ever bothered to actually check the actual cutting height.
__________________
The reigning Mayor of Stupidville
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-23-2013, 09:56 AM
IRRITECH's Avatar
IRRITECH IRRITECH is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ATLANTA, GA
Posts: 931
Update. After sending Exmark a rather nasty email, the dealer called and told us to bring the mower back in and they would see what they could do. After setting the machine up to there specs, the height difference was 3/4" of an inch. Solution..... they cut 3/4" off the front casters. Yes, they cut 3/4" off the caster pivots and the caster yoke. Now, the entire caster pivot is only 4" to begin with so removing 3/4" is approx 20%. What in the world is that ???? The one part of the machine that arguably takes the most abuse has just had 20% of it's structure removed. Oh, well, back to Exmark.
__________________
The reigning Mayor of Stupidville
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-23-2013, 10:34 AM
whiffyspark whiffyspark is online now
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chesapeake beach
Posts: 2,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRRITECH View Post
So either no one has ever had this problem or no one has ever bothered to actually check the actual cutting height.
I'm willing to bet most people don't care. We set cut height by the blade measurement. With a 1/2" difference front and back of blade tips.

It's a known fact the "cut height" is never right
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-23-2013, 11:00 AM
IRRITECH's Avatar
IRRITECH IRRITECH is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ATLANTA, GA
Posts: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiffyspark View Post
I'm willing to bet most people don't care. We set cut height by the blade measurement. With a 1/2" difference front and back of blade tips.

It's a known fact the "cut height" is never right
Posted via Mobile Device
For the small guys with one or 2 mowers and 1 crew, it may not be a problem. With multiple crews and mowers , and cutting mainly Bermuda and Zoysia, the height of cut HAS to be within 1/8".
__________________
The reigning Mayor of Stupidville
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-23-2013, 12:23 PM
whiffyspark whiffyspark is online now
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chesapeake beach
Posts: 2,784
Like I said we go by the height of the blades them selves.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-23-2013, 07:51 PM
IRRITECH's Avatar
IRRITECH IRRITECH is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ATLANTA, GA
Posts: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiffyspark View Post
Like I said we go by the height of the blades them selves.
Posted via Mobile Device
read the first post. The BLADE HEIGHT IS 3/4" OFF. Now what do you do??
__________________
The reigning Mayor of Stupidville
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-23-2013, 08:36 PM
LandFakers's Avatar
LandFakers LandFakers is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 5,552
They cut up your brand new mower?!?!?! Id demand another mower or atleast new yokes. Thats the most rediculous solution ive ever heard
__________________
Rob

PlowSite-SnowFakers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-07-2013, 08:59 PM
IRRITECH's Avatar
IRRITECH IRRITECH is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ATLANTA, GA
Posts: 931
Update: They agreed to replace the front frame and deck on the mower. Took it in on Thursday afternoon and the Exmark tech looked at me with a straight face and said " when we replace this you are going to be right back where you were." My response " Measure every deck in here and find me one that works, otherwise we won't take it". So much for customer service. Went back Friday to pick it up, surprise , surprise, we got a brand new 2013 mower.

On a side note, we purchased this mower brand new in Feb. From the look of the new mower, we bought a 2012 model. Not that big of a deal, but still annoying. Still have the plastic idler pulley. I would venture to guess that if Toro comes out with a floating deck hydro walkbehind, this will be our last Exmark purchase. I can understand cost saving, but when your quality goes to hell and you are charging more, that's a bad combination for the end user.
__________________
The reigning Mayor of Stupidville
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-08-2013, 06:29 AM
greystone mechanic greystone mechanic is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: white hall, md.
Posts: 17
Exmark IS Toro now. Still unusual for bad customer service. Sounds like the dealer sucks. In my dealer days we didn"t stop until there was a solution.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 PM.

Page generated in 0.07567 seconds with 9 queries