Register free!
Search
 
     

Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-24-2013, 06:44 PM
mmatlock mmatlock is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: franklin, tn
Posts: 8
boom vs chemlawngun

I come from an agricultural background and have always used TEEJET nozzles at 10 gallons per acre.Can someone explain to me why truck mount sprayers with guns need to spray so much volume.It seems like too much carrier product to me.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-24-2013, 07:17 PM
greendoctor greendoctor is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 7,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmatlock View Post
I come from an agricultural background and have always used TEEJET nozzles at 10 gallons per acre.Can someone explain to me why truck mount sprayers with guns need to spray so much volume.It seems like too much carrier product to me.
It is because a lawn gun puts out extremely large droplets spaced fairly wide and more carrier makes discrepancies in coverage uniformity less hazardous. I use booms with Teejet nozzles, as well as single nozzle hand pieces with the same nozzles for application to lawns rather than a lawn gun. My target application volume is more like 20-200 gallons per acre. 10 gallons per acre can be a very drift prone application. The weeds in lawns are also not always presenting such a large target as pasture or field crop weeds either.
__________________
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin 1775

Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power.
Benjamin Franklin Poor Richard's Almanac1738
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-24-2013, 09:19 PM
RigglePLC's Avatar
RigglePLC RigglePLC is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Grand Rapids MI
Posts: 9,251
Partly this is a hangover from the early operations that mixed fert with the water and herbicide. You need more carrier to apply fert without burning the grass. Also you can have bigger droplets and a lot less drift. A hand gun (which I prefer) works very well for small yards with fences and lots of flowers and bushes. If one is applying herbicide only, then much lower volume is fine. A ride-on applicator would apply about a half- or a third gallon per thousand sqft. Boom or boomless output.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-27-2013, 01:13 PM
GreenUtah's Avatar
GreenUtah GreenUtah is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 866
As both Riggle and greendoctor stated, drift is number one since you will almost certainly have susceptible, no target ornamentals plants near your turf somewhere on the property.

Booms/boomless sprayers still have their place on large open areas like sports fields, golf and some parks, then cutting back in the "sensitive areas" with a handgun or wand.

I still have a preference for combo mixing fert with control products as that allows me to change my rates from day to day to adjust for things like a lot of rain, heat, etc., taking my N rates up or down, adjusting iron and slow release rates, etc. In those situations, you have to have enough water to "flow" the product out into the turf for proper coverage.

Handguns are still the king on urban routes. Fast, accurate, flexible.
__________________
http://www.mygreenutah.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 AM.

Page generated in 0.06172 seconds with 9 queries