Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-24-2013, 10:22 AM
zechstoker's Avatar
zechstoker zechstoker is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 975
Got the pictures take yesterday, but got wrapped up in other business, so I didn't get a chance to post these. Anyhow, here's the side-by-side comparison.



__________________
Zech Stoker
est. 1983
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-24-2013, 03:04 PM
Ridin' Green Ridin' Green is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8,721
The original definitely has a higher lift, but it also has a mulching edge/area, and that type of blade loses some of it's lift due to the higher edge forcing part of the air stream back down into the turf with the mulched clippings. The lower lift blade also has a much longer lift fin, so it's probably close to being a wash.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-17-2013, 07:03 AM
joed joed is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,108
I've got the same 21" Exmark. It came with the red blade that is the original you got. This blade bag wells and mulches decently. It does however have an annoying habit of leaving stringers when you cut at 2.5" or above. I've tried to cut with the front set 1/2" lower than the back but the problems still persists.

I contacted Exmark about the cutting issue. They responded by suggesting that I change blades to either their bagging blade or something called the extreme2 blade. Part numbers are: 108-3759 for the bagging blade and 108-0954 for the extreme 2 blade. I have no idea if either one would work.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-17-2013, 09:46 PM
Jimslawncareservice Jimslawncareservice is online now
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: mn
Posts: 3,964
what is the part number for the red mulching blade if anyone knows? I have a low lift and atomic or gator looking blade. both are horrible at mulching, and whats the point of bagging all the time with a 21?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-18-2013, 04:51 PM
zechstoker's Avatar
zechstoker zechstoker is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 975
I typically have to bag with a 21 due to the amount of growth on a number of my lawns. It's not bad though. The bag only fills up once per lawn in most situations, so I'm not having to stop to empty it numerous times at each property. On the flip side, this could easily avoided if I ran a bigger mower that actually mulched properly, but my boss never has ponied up the money for that type of upgrade. At this point, I'm not too concerned about getting that upgrade since I'm planning to switch careers after this Fall.
__________________
Zech Stoker
est. 1983
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Page generated in 0.05929 seconds with 10 queries