Register free!

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-16-2013, 11:50 PM
alexschultz1's Avatar
alexschultz1 alexschultz1 is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: north of atlanta
Posts: 1,357
7" vs wide tracks on ditch witch

The 7" tracks will allow me to access 36" gates however I really don't want to lose my pushing and traction force while using attachments and grading. How much of a difference do the wide tracks make? It's for the new sk755
__________________

Ive taken advantage of the world market and started a new business. We are building bombs in the shape of prayer blankets for our middle eastern customers. Business couldnt be better. The prophets are going through the roof!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-25-2013, 04:37 PM
alexschultz1's Avatar
alexschultz1 alexschultz1 is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: north of atlanta
Posts: 1,357
Bump, my loan acceptance is right around the corner
__________________

Ive taken advantage of the world market and started a new business. We are building bombs in the shape of prayer blankets for our middle eastern customers. Business couldnt be better. The prophets are going through the roof!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-25-2013, 05:22 PM
alldayrj's Avatar
alldayrj alldayrj is online now
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 3,122
If i had one i would only it where i couldnt use a bigger machine. Aka 36" gates. If thats a problem you run into enough, then keep it narrow.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:28 PM.

Page generated in 0.05852 seconds with 9 queries