Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-26-2013, 09:59 PM
Ridin' Green Ridin' Green is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8,689
Help adjusting RPM's

I need a little advise on adjusting my Kawi's RPM's. Please, only replies from those who actually know the correct way to do this.

I have a Deere Z950 with the FX850. I just mounted a tach today, and it shows I'm holding steady at around 3570-3580 at WOT off load. With the deck engaged I'm holding right between 3450-3480. I know there's a way to adjust this from all the reading I've done on this sight, and I've also read that someone here has posted either diagrams or actual pictures on how to adjust the RPM's correctly.

I want to have the RPM's in the 3580-3600 range or so with the blades engaged. Thanks in advance. I appreciate any help I can get.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-26-2013, 10:20 PM
Restrorob's Avatar
Restrorob Restrorob is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Show'n my truck off !
Posts: 10,730
Me know no-ting......


__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by piston slapper View Post
You never learn anything until you admit you don't know it all...
Quote:
Originally Posted by MannsLawnService View Post
some times the man in my mirror isn't so smart...
"Why go out preserved when you can go out beat up, worn out, sliding in sideways screaming, Holy Sh!t What A Ride" !!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-26-2013, 10:23 PM
JCLawn and more's Avatar
JCLawn and more JCLawn and more is offline
LawnSite Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 4,948
What's you reason for wanting close to 19,000 fpm? Just curious
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-26-2013, 10:33 PM
Ridin' Green Ridin' Green is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Restrorob View Post
Me know no-ting......


Excellent. I knew one of the gurus in this forum could help. Thanks a ton bro!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-26-2013, 11:02 PM
Ridin' Green Ridin' Green is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCLawn and more View Post
What's you reason for wanting close to 19,000 fpm? Just curious
Where'd you come up with that figure? Unless you now for sure that the PTO pulley is the exact same diameter as the spindle pulleys, there's no way to know for sure what the BTS in FPM will be. I will measure them both tomorrow to see, but I'm pretty certain they are different diameters.

I'm not trying to do anything more than get it back to where it is supposed to operate. The last few hundred RPM's of any brand engine on any Z is the range that is most responsible for producing the best QOC. I need to get those RPM's back where they should be at to eliminate the stragglers I am getting lately that weren't there before the dealer "adjusted" it downward from where it was when new. I don't know what all they did to it, but at full sticks it is now slower as well.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-27-2013, 12:15 PM
Ridin' Green Ridin' Green is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCLawn and more View Post
What's you reason for wanting close to 19,000 fpm? Just curious
I measured the PTO pulley, and then the spindle pulleys. The PTO pulley needs to revolve 1.11 times to make the spindle pulley revolve once, so basically 10% more times per revolution. That, along with all the other math, makes the BTS in FPM much less than 18K, and nowhere near 19K, when the engine is turning 3450 on load. This is why I want to bump it up to where it should be turning the BTS as advertised at 18K FPM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-27-2013, 12:18 PM
JCLawn and more's Avatar
JCLawn and more JCLawn and more is offline
LawnSite Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 4,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridin' Green View Post
I measured the PTO pulley, and then the spindle pulleys. The PTO pulley needs to revolve 1.11 times to make the spindle pulley revolve once, so basically 10% more times per revolution. That, along with all the other math, makes the BTS in FPM much less than 18K, and nowhere near 19K, when the engine is turning 3450 on load. This is why I want to bump it up to where it should be turning the BTS as advertised at 18K FPM.
You need to cut back on the coffee haha or get more work
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-27-2013, 12:22 PM
Ridin' Green Ridin' Green is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8,689
Why, because I know how to do math, and want my mower to operate as designed?
I've been working plenty, believe me. Lots of construction mixed with mowing and other lawn care work. I'm good I think. Could use another cup of coffee though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-27-2013, 12:24 PM
JCLawn and more's Avatar
JCLawn and more JCLawn and more is offline
LawnSite Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 4,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridin' Green View Post
Why, because I know how to do math, and want my mower to operate as designed?
I've been working plenty, believe me. Lots of construction mixed with mowing and other lawn care work. I'm good I think. Could use another cup of coffee though.
Because you have been thinking about this wayyyyyyy to long haha
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-27-2013, 12:30 PM
Ridin' Green Ridin' Green is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8,689
Probably so, but I like things RIGHT
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 AM.

Page generated in 0.07464 seconds with 9 queries