Register free!


Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-17-2013, 01:55 PM
Skipster Skipster is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 778
I understand that its not possible to put absolutely every possible susceptible weed on the label. But, that label is a good indicator of what economically important weeds may be controlled. With KRBS being such an economically important problem, it would stand to reason that if a product actually controlled it, the manufacturer would want to put that information on its label. If an economically important weed is not on a label, it may be a good assumption that a particular product won't have the desired effect on that weed.

The bottom line is that I see guys sink a lot of money and time into different witch's brews that don't give them much efficacy. Instead of sending someone down a rabbit hole chasing expensive options with little more than a prayer to use as evidence, I like to rely on solid evidence.

With all the scientists and resources that chemical manufacturers and universities have working on just this one particular issue, I don't think that many guys on this board are going to magically come across something effective that hasn't already been tried. And if it has been tried and is effective, do you think any of the manufacturers would miss the opportunity to sell it?
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-17-2013, 03:21 PM
ed2hess's Avatar
ed2hess ed2hess is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Austin Texas 78727
Posts: 11,847
I kinda have to laugh a little since contrator says that if we do 6 apps a year we wouldn't have this problem. That would cost us about $3000 off our bottom line. At present he sprays in spring and we use dry fertilize the rest of the time. The good news is customer is happy but I have to ext4a mows which take about 8 each mow.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-17-2013, 08:28 PM
foreplease's Avatar
foreplease foreplease is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: St. Joseph, MI
Posts: 1,270
Dat

Skipster: does DAT stand for days after treatment? Thanks in advance.
__________________
Michigan PABL
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-17-2013, 11:18 PM
ed2hess's Avatar
ed2hess ed2hess is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Austin Texas 78727
Posts: 11,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by foreplease View Post
Skipster: does DAT stand for days after treatment? Thanks in advance.
Yes that would make sense, I see it come back after use of Roundup on some small plots.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-24-2013, 01:53 PM
ed2hess's Avatar
ed2hess ed2hess is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Austin Texas 78727
Posts: 11,847
I sprayed a little area of KRBS yesterday using backpack Celsius plus MSO. It was about 70F so we will see. There was some broadleaf weeds so might see some effect on those.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-25-2013, 10:09 AM
WeedManWeatherford WeedManWeatherford is online now
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Weatherford, TX
Posts: 16
Well, it looks like I will stick to glyphosate now while there is some remaining green and possibly a retreat in the spring for KRBS as needed. Of the glyphos, I have found that Kleen Up works the best for me. I will still highly suggest to my customers that the dead material be removed and SOD placed. I have so many customers who always want to seed, and I understand, but we will likely end up in the same situation "152 DAT."
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-11-2013, 11:17 PM
ed2hess's Avatar
ed2hess ed2hess is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Austin Texas 78727
Posts: 11,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by ed2hess View Post
I sprayed a little area of KRBS yesterday using backpack Celsius plus MSO. It was about 70F so we will see. There was some broadleaf weeds so might see some effect on those.
I checke d the areas today and to my surprise I had some browning onKRBS and about 60% kill on broad leaf weeds. Matter of fact the same media had KRBS treated a month earlier with 2 doses of MSMA at 90F and that area is now green with new little king ranch after second treatment it was straw brown so....
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-12-2013, 04:39 AM
greendoctor greendoctor is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 7,428
MSMA will top kill a number of weeds. Does not mean it goes down to the roots. SU and imidazoline compounds go down to the roots.
__________________
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin 1775

Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power.
Benjamin Franklin Poor Richard's Almanac1738
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-12-2013, 11:43 PM
ed2hess's Avatar
ed2hess ed2hess is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Austin Texas 78727
Posts: 11,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeedManWeatherford View Post
Well, it looks like I will stick to glyphosate now while there is some remaining green and possibly a retreat in the spring for KRBS as needed. Of the glyphos, I have found that Kleen Up works the best for me. I will still highly suggest to my customers that the dead material be removed and SOD placed. I have so many customers who always want to seed, and I understand, but we will likely end up in the same situation "152 DAT."
Wellhere you go, seen this today at Wataburger. Definitely attacking KRBS with roundup. Bet he is hoping that bermuda goes dormant . May be the best way to, I willwatch it inspring.
Attached Images
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 PM.

Page generated in 0.07125 seconds with 10 queries