Register free!
Search
 
     

Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:44 AM
twomancrew twomancrew is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: East, IA
Posts: 948
Future of fert in Iowa

I thought others might want to watch last night's IA gov's debate because they discuss the future regulations on fert in IA. Go to 43:25ish for the discussion.
http://www.iptv.org/iowapress/story....814_gov_debate
Lets not make a political conversation. Maybe focus on personal responsibility and any land stewardship practices you have to better utilize the fertilizer in your program?
Sadly I must be honest and say most my accounts haven't had a soil sample taken. None of them have had any service other than mowing for who knows how long. I don't do anything other than not waste the product. I apply less than a ton of 46-0-0 a year. Usually I put a 50# bag across 30K instead of 20K that is on the label. I only do this once in the Spring. I sprayed some UAN a few weeks ago, the day before we got out last rain, but I only sprayed a couple of small accts I mow. I was spraying some dicamba and 2,4-d that day to zap some pesky clover and plantains that survived the first spray I did when I spread the 46-0-0 back in the Spring.
The fact that it comes up in a debate opened my eyes a bit. I hope I am doing all I can to be responsible.
__________________
[/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-15-2014, 04:37 PM
The Turf Guys The Turf Guys is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 103
Notice how they want to shift the blame from the farmers????? If anything certain mandates will come down the line for us but farmers will get a pass just like they usually do.

And I come from a long line of farmers down around Lamoni so I'm not just some hater.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-15-2014, 06:27 PM
Skipster Skipster is online now
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 717
The senator said ďIf you put fertilizer on your land, youíre part of the problem.Ē Watch this video from the University of Minnesota (bordering Iowa) and listen to Dr. Horganís words at the end of the video.

University Research Dispels Fertilizer Myth

He says:
Quote:
If you donít fertilize at all think youíre doing better, youíre actually doing a lot more harm than if you properly fertilize your turf
If we donít get the word out about the benefits of lawn fertilization and if we donít back it up by making responsible applications, our industry is going to be regulated out of existence and the environment will be no better off.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-15-2014, 06:37 PM
larryinalabama larryinalabama is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ragland Al
Posts: 10,258
I don't know how you can make it "not political" because that's all it is.

Your best hope is that Scotts lines the pockets of the Iowa Democrat cacus!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-15-2014, 06:54 PM
twomancrew twomancrew is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: East, IA
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skipster View Post
The senator said ďIf you put fertilizer on your land, youíre part of the problem.Ē Watch this video from the University of Minnesota (bordering Iowa) and listen to Dr. Horganís words at the end of the video.

University Research Dispels Fertilizer Myth

He says:


If we donít get the word out about the benefits of lawn fertilization and if we donít back it up by making responsible applications, our industry is going to be regulated out of existence and the environment will be no better off.
Great link, 30 sec ad is worth it.
__________________
[/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-15-2014, 07:13 PM
larryinalabama larryinalabama is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ragland Al
Posts: 10,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by twomancrew View Post
Actually if you watch the whole video you will see this is the only subject that isn't made into partisan talking points. It was almost strange the way the 2 candidates acted about it. Horse and ponies. All show. That's also not following my request to not discuss the politics-mostly because I don't believe there are any at this point Liarinalabama!
You just made it political, proves my point.

You and I both know putting fertilizer on lawns is a wonderful thing.

So like I say if Scotts/true green lines the pockets of the government the practice will contuniue.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-15-2014, 08:07 PM
Kawizx62003 Kawizx62003 is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Transition Zone
Posts: 512
This is why I don't think I am even exploring the idea of adding this as a service. Not sure if that's a dumb idea or not.
Posted via Mobile Device
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-15-2014, 08:53 PM
Jimslawncareservice Jimslawncareservice is online now
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: mn
Posts: 3,951
we farm in mn. dad heard a report today that farmer should apply as much fert and fungisides as possible. maybe they all should get on the same page
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-15-2014, 09:44 PM
Skipster Skipster is online now
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimslawncareservice View Post
we farm in mn. dad heard a report today that farmer should apply as much fert and fungisides as possible. maybe they all should get on the same page
This idea doesn't make much sense. All it does is make less food and make each piece much more expensive. Government's role here could be to incentivize proper stewardship, not to make it harder to produce food.

My concern is that the bad actors who don't practice good stewardship in our industry (don't regularly calibrate, don't rotate pesticide MOAs, blanket apply POST herbicides, etc) are going to encourage harsh regulations that will make it harder for all of us to earn a living.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:04 PM
twomancrew twomancrew is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: East, IA
Posts: 948
Well if a sample is looked at N cation is used to determine the maximum amount of N the soil can handle. Any more than that is a waste. In turf we don't go anywhere near 200# per acre annually so we don't use those values. A crop will devour nutrients and minerals like turf folks don't know. We don't go anywhere near that rate because turf doesn't need it. A sample can tell if there is a problem affecting nutrient uptake and if there is a problem it needs corrected before nutrient is added to turf.

Yes, as far as nutrient is concerned a farmer is justified to look at what maximum inputs are and what ROI can be.

IPM is another conv. for smarter folks than me in another thread somewhere. Can't say what is being promoted as far as general pesticide use is concerned. There are economic thresholds that can be used to make informed decisions if needed.
__________________
[/SIGPIC]

Last edited by twomancrew; 08-15-2014 at 10:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 PM.

Page generated in 0.07275 seconds with 10 queries