Register free!

The Green Industry's Resource Center



Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-22-2005, 09:17 AM
ritchiem's Avatar
ritchiem ritchiem is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Meaford, ON
Posts: 58
Very Clean
Easy to Nav
Sizable Text

Because it is so clean and neat, I would consider justifying the text so it is even on both margins.

Donít be skimpy on the project pics when you put them up.

Get a form created for your contact page.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-22-2005, 10:24 AM
jpmako's Avatar
jpmako jpmako is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bergen - Rockland
Posts: 593
Quote:
Originally Posted by ritchiem
Very Clean
Easy to Nav
Sizable Text

Because it is so clean and neat, I would consider justifying the text so it is even on both margins.

Donít be skimpy on the project pics when you put them up.

Get a form created for your contact page.
Thanks for the compliments,

I am actually working on the contact form today it should be live in a day or two.

Jason
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-22-2005, 03:10 PM
Tiller1240's Avatar
Tiller1240 Tiller1240 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 18
JP,
Very nice site. Very clean, organized, and professional. I am also in the process of designed a site, and could use some help finding some nice pictures. Do you mind sharing where you found some of your pics? Any help would be appreciated.
__________________
PerfiCut Lawn & Landscape
www.PerfiCut.net
www.MDSnowRemoval.com
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-22-2005, 04:01 PM
BSDeality's Avatar
BSDeality BSDeality is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 2,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonygreek
no offense, but for such a simple site, there is zero need to generate content from a db. the reason i say this is that your site will very likely get no love whatsoever from search engines. not sure what your web career was, but you can't design a retail/service site like you would an intranet site, or any other that would be more apt to be db-driven. if you don't want the engines indexing you, do what you feel is best for the running of your site, but if you are using it as an organic marketing method, you're likely to lose the search war right out of the gate.

my 2 cents...
how would the fact that it is database driven make any difference? the data is mostly static, driven from hardlinks. Its not like it is keyword-input driven.

Keep the database, you're on the right track.
__________________
Matt
Efficiency = Profit
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-22-2005, 05:07 PM
tonygreek's Avatar
tonygreek tonygreek is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 2,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by BSDeality
how would the fact that it is database driven make any difference?
it makes all the difference in the world as far as the indexing bots are concerned, but why worry about them? google has specifically addressed the potential indexing pitfalls.

Quote:
the data is mostly static, driven from hardlinks.
currently, that's a saving grace for that design, but you need to absolutely understand how to best design, word, and implement databased content that's any more complex that that, especially if he plans to make actual, practical use of db content.

Quote:
Keep the database, you're on the right track.
again, just be sure you know how to implement it, especially if you plan on adding more content. as it is right now, why add the additional layers of complexity? if it's going to grow significantly beyond the current state, just be sure you have boned up on your search optimization as it relates to db content. if you only want to attract visitors to your website through reading a physical print ad of your link, then throw my advice out the window.

my original point to this is "why add complexity where it is not needed, it really does not make your life any easier to add content (if you code, you can add content easily), and that if implemented imperfectly, you might never show up on the engine's radar." nothing more, nothing less. i'll equate it to running a print ad that contains entirely italicized white text on a black background. you'll make it illegible to approx 10% of the population. for your own development edification, why disqualify 10% of your target market because they have trouble reading your ad? so, if it's not mission critical, why use dynamic content, which if not utilized correctly, could make the all-important content invisible to the major engines? those engines will supply significantly more than 10% of your visitors, so why disregard their impact?

i have no idea what mako's web background is, other than he said it was his career. if he's already taken this into consideration, then i guess i'm typing for the exercise, or for anyone else who runs dynamic sites, or even worse, flash sites.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-22-2005, 06:12 PM
jpmako's Avatar
jpmako jpmako is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bergen - Rockland
Posts: 593
Tony,

Like I said it is being designed this way for a variety of reasons. One of the major reasons is going to be the dynamic content. At this point I am not too worried about people finding my site through google. I am more concerned with getting the layout complete and adding the back-end features such as customer manager, billing, on-line payments etc... Yes this was my career, I went to school for it and have what I believe to be a slight talent for it. I have designed many company Intranet/ Internet sites using this methodology and have yet to run into a problem with indexing. I am sorry that it isn't up to your standards LOL.
Seriously this is not going to be so much of a marketing tool as it is a way to get my clients to pay online and learn of some of the extra services that my company offers. But I do advertise it on my marketing material.

I do agree that Flash sites are very hard to get indexed properly. Especially if the site is entirely Flash and no HTML That is a very common mistake and all too often I stumble across a site that looks great but has no function in the real world.

For all of those that do like it THANK YOU!

Jason
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-22-2005, 08:22 PM
tonygreek's Avatar
tonygreek tonygreek is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 2,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpmako
I am sorry that it isn't up to your standards LOL.
i didn't realize you only wanted esthetic feedback. from now on, i'll just post something useful like, "it's pretty. good job."

Quote:
That is a very common mistake and all too often I stumble across a site that looks great but has no function in the real world.
which is why i pointed out the dynamic issue.

Quote:
For all of those that do like it THANK YOU!
i don't recall saying i didn't like it.

best of luck.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:23 PM.

Page generated in 0.09075 seconds with 9 queries