|
#71
|
||||
|
||||
|
The annuals look awesome, the setup is not ideal were money never an object but it is the best alternative to an additional zone.
Next.
__________________
Crayons taste like Purple |
|
#72
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I have no problem with that for the most part. |
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would be interested to see how well subsurface drip does in parkways for turf after a few years. I've not heard anything good.
|
|
#75
|
||||
|
||||
|
Had it in miles of turf in CO in narrow and wide parkways; it was fantastic.
__________________
Crayons taste like Purple |
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
|
hmmm, some of the high rollers on here are going head to head with this thread, you guys are usually in agreement with each other and/or ganging up on someone else, ha, this is interesting, i will stay subscribed...
i've been following this thread because it's an interesting topic...i will say i'm with muddywater on this one, when it comes to putting ONE spray on a rotor zone..you always have to bid against your competition...adding a zone can be a deal breaker...always design a system correctly, yes, but when it comes to that odd nook that would be ridiculous to add a separate zone for, then just throw a spray on there...you can adjust the spray enough to make the PR close enough, at least for that one little spot... i'm just trying to be realistic here...in a perfect world, it would be on a zone all by itself |
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree with muddywater also.... As a matter of fact, I'm probably going to do the same thing in my yard... Been trying to figure out a way to get more water on a spot that 1 rotor hits but the other rotor is blocked by a shrub now.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
















Linear Mode
