|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm from the "other" forum and I read it and agree and understand the statement.
We are not all uneducated, just making business decisions.
|
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
I did a little math on a 1K sq ft turf:
Lesco fert: $1 of fert will cover 1K, add $1(this would be aprox 1/3 gal of Q4) maximum per application for weed spot spraying. Done on a 5 step program comes to a total of $10 for the season. CGM properly labeled as a pesticide patented from Iowa St., "Renaissance" in this example, costs $30 per 25 lb bag which covers 1250 sq ft. multiply the $30 times .8 to get $24 to cover 1K of turf. From what I hear CGM should be put down at 40 lb per year, so double this. $48 for the season. Keep in mind that the synthetic apps require 5 stops per year while the CGM can be done in 2 or 1 if you want to put it all down at once. But the product cost of CGM for me is 480 percent that of Synthetic. Example 5K sq ft yard for 1 year product cost for me: Synthetic $50, CGM $240. I was very surprised at this difference. |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
No offense to anyone here, but I think you all are missing the boat.
The issue isn't necessarily should I use this organic product or not. The issue and end goal is to create a low/no input sustainable system. If done correctly, over time your input costs will most certainly decrease. That being said, if your simply replacing your conventional inputs with organics than you only got one foot on the boat. Also no one has mentioned a mixed system approach. On the way to creating a sustainable system (eg. moving from conventional to alternative) there is nothing stopping you from mixing the two approaches. Fertilize with organics and conventional until the system can support itself with a few organic inputs/year. Feed the soil to feed the plants. Deal with pests using IPM and use conventional/organic low impact pesticides only when absolutely needed. Encourage natural populations of beneficials by providing habitats for them. Promote landscapes that utilize plants (natives or other suitable plants for the site) that require little or no supplemental water or nutrient inputs. Promote reduction or elimination of lawns!!! Should cost be a factor, absolutely not. If it costs more, pass the cost off to the client. If your charging more just because your "organic", but your operational costs are the same, than shame on you. Promote building sustainable, healthy environments that will pay for themselves in the long run. Show everyone, including yourself, that you are truly a member of the green industry, not just someone out to make a quick buck. Last edited by Kiril; 07-30-2007 at 02:19 PM. |
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Organic
Very true, we run into the same issue with customers, especially mowing themselves. They refuse to raise mowing height in the heat of summer, and blame us for a burned lawn, or a infestation of bentgrass. We definitely promote organics first, but I do agree that there is a need for chemical use, especially for those customers looking for a fairway lawn. Fortunatley, many of our existing customers have warmed up to our organic, meaning, using non conventional ferts and focusing on organic matter, approach. Others, don't even realize that we switched products.
__________________
University of Maine Landscape Horticulture 2003 Landscape Design . |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|












Linear Mode
