Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-12-2006, 04:01 AM
bigjeeping's Avatar
bigjeeping bigjeeping is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 900
Timbrens and Ball joints?

Does anyone think that timbrens could add any extra wear/tear on your ball joints? Mine were fine and then all of a sudden I'm getting new tires put on at Belle Tire and they tell me theres movement in the front uppers and lowers. AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH one by one the bills are going to strangle me.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-12-2006, 04:34 AM
Madstriper Madstriper is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jackson Mississippi
Posts: 131
Not sure we are talking about the same thing, but my dad's 95 F250 has the Timbren rubber overload donuts on the rear, and the truck has over 350k hard very overloaded miles on it. Have done nothing at all to the suspension/front end besides shocks. Tires have always lasted like they were suppose to also.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-12-2006, 03:30 PM
Sharky Sharky is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ida, MI
Posts: 20
I have had timbrens on every 4x4 we have had to help supplement front suspension with the plow on. I have never had any extra wear on the front end because of them. If anything they help with spring life and such. Every ford we have had has had front end issues anyway. Chevys and dodges haven't. at least not in the same amount of miles.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 PM.

Page generated in 0.06569 seconds with 7 queries