Register free!

The Green Industry's Resource Center



Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-24-2006, 11:19 PM
instyle instyle is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 380
6.2L VS 6.5L Diesels!!!???

I am lookinng at a 91 GMC with the 6.2 Diesel, isthis any good, or should I be waiting for a 6.5L?
__________________
some of these and some of those.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-25-2006, 05:41 PM
lawnmaniac883's Avatar
lawnmaniac883 lawnmaniac883 is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: largo, FL
Posts: 2,621
Gutless engines..................
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-25-2006, 07:04 PM
Scag48's Avatar
Scag48 Scag48 is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 6,061
6.2 was a terrible, gutless motor. 6.5 wasn't much better. I had a 6.2, never had the 6.5, but heard it was yet another GM screwup.
__________________

Go hard, go fast, or go home
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-25-2006, 07:22 PM
mcwlandscaping's Avatar
mcwlandscaping mcwlandscaping is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 3,169
350 or 454 are the engines of choice for those years
__________________

Summer Setup

Ford Trucks
PJ Trailers
JD & Wright Equipment/Mowers
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-25-2006, 08:20 PM
Gravel Rat Gravel Rat is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 9,544
The 6.2 and 6.5 are not the best motors made the 6.2 is a gutless pig I think it only puts out 140-150hp. The 6.5 is also gutless I drove 3500 1 ton dump 4x4 carrying cord of firewood a few times it was at the point of getting out and push. GM screwed up with those engines they were just as worse than the 6.0 PSD.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-25-2006, 08:55 PM
TLS's Avatar
TLS TLS is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: N&W Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 7,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcwlandscaping
350 or 454 are the engines of choice for those years
Good point.

The 6.2/6.5 is old tech diesel. Not the most reliable, and as others have said, harldy powerful enough to get out of it's own way.

Only positive is, they were capable of 20mpg highway, where the 350/454 struggled to get half that.
__________________
TLS
2004 GMC 2500HD Reg Cab BOSS 9.2 V-Plow
2013 eXmark LazerZ X-Series 60" 34hp EFI (RED) Kohler
2006 Hustler SuperZ 28EFI 60" Power Chute Design OCDC SOLD!
Perma-green Magnum
1996 48" SCAG Belt WB 14hp Kawasaki Classic Deck
Echo 2 strokes PB-755 & SRM 280
Eastman WM20H 20" Commercial Push mower (NEW for 2013)
Commercial Lawnboy trim mower 3-FOR SALE!http://www.lawnsite.com/showthread.php?t=424203
Solo since 1980
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-27-2006, 12:41 AM
Scag48's Avatar
Scag48 Scag48 is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 6,061
The mileage on the 6.2 was great! But, being a 350 gas motor block converted to a 381(?) diesel just wasn't the best move for power and reliability. Although, the manual says that the engine was designed with fuel economy in mind, not pulling power, so maybe GM's only true mistake was the reliability.
__________________

Go hard, go fast, or go home
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-27-2006, 10:02 AM
TLS's Avatar
TLS TLS is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: N&W Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 7,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scag48
The mileage on the 6.2 was great! But, being a 350 gas motor block converted to a 381(?) diesel just wasn't the best move for power and reliability. Although, the manual says that the engine was designed with fuel economy in mind, not pulling power, so maybe GM's only true mistake was the reliability.
That info is incorrect.

The 6.2/6.5 engine has NOTHING to do with ANY gas engine.

The 6.2 was pretty reliable if used for what it was intended. It's when the turbo's were added that problems arised.
__________________
TLS
2004 GMC 2500HD Reg Cab BOSS 9.2 V-Plow
2013 eXmark LazerZ X-Series 60" 34hp EFI (RED) Kohler
2006 Hustler SuperZ 28EFI 60" Power Chute Design OCDC SOLD!
Perma-green Magnum
1996 48" SCAG Belt WB 14hp Kawasaki Classic Deck
Echo 2 strokes PB-755 & SRM 280
Eastman WM20H 20" Commercial Push mower (NEW for 2013)
Commercial Lawnboy trim mower 3-FOR SALE!http://www.lawnsite.com/showthread.php?t=424203
Solo since 1980
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-27-2006, 02:01 PM
Scag48's Avatar
Scag48 Scag48 is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 6,061
I'm pretty sure I've heard from numerous sources that the 6.2 was a 350 gas block with a diesel head. And yes, the 6.2 reliability was terrible, even when they were naturally aspirated. I dropped thousands into the one I had and I let go of it at 115K miles. No heavy towing, just a mowing trailer.
__________________

Go hard, go fast, or go home
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-27-2006, 04:39 PM
Gravel Rat Gravel Rat is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 9,544
The 6.2 was a diesel the 350 olds was the converted gas engine you took the plugs out and installed injectors. It was a real POS it started Chev with the bad name then it progressed from there. Hey atleast Ford and Chevy offered diesel P/U trucks back in the early early 80s. Chevy started the 6.2 Ford started with the 6.9. Not big power engines but it was a start then Ford changed to 7.3 IDI had problems with cavitation but was controlable. The 6.2 ran till 88 late 89 then Chev produced a 6.5 it wasn't the greatest it used a timing chain to run the injection pump. Then the newer 6.5s had real injection pump problems. The 6.5 was riddled with problems they didn't produce big power but they got decent fuel mileage.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 PM.

Page generated in 0.09340 seconds with 7 queries