search sponsored by:
Advanced Search

The Green Industry's Resource Center

Old 11-01-2006, 05:01 PM
borris borris is offline
LawnSite Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Delano
Posts: 2
ferris 2100 or toro 560?

any opinions on which to choose, i keep hearing how great the suspension is on the ferris, looking at a ferris is2001 with a 61" deck and 25hp engine or a toro z560 series witha 60" deck nad 30 hp engine, 7300.00 for the ferris or 8000.00 for the toro, just a little worried about a 61 deck with 25 hp engine.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2006, 05:18 PM
rodfather's Avatar
rodfather rodfather is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Clinton, NJ
Posts: 9,631
If you get a chance, get a copy of Turf Magazine for the September issue. My company field tested the Ferris IS2000 Z you're talking about (for 7 weeks) and I wrote up the test results personally.

Sorry, I know absolutely zilch about that Toro model.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 12:21 AM
procut's Avatar
procut procut is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Don't worry about it...
Posts: 1,853
I just bought a Z 500 Toro. However, I demoed the ferris model you are refering to twice before buying the toro. Don't get me wrong, the Ferris ride is awsome. But the quality of cut could not even compare, plus it was another $1000. On a only moderatly tall lawn, it left windrows, even with the discharge chute up. I have a 7 year old Toro Z Master with 1500+ hours on it, plus the side of the deck smashed in, and it mows and stripes better than the Ferris I demoed.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Layout Style:

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 PM.

Page generated in 0.06542 seconds with 8 queries