Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-11-2000, 06:55 PM
Victor's Avatar
Victor Victor is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,635
I was wondering if any of you charge for having to double-cut a lawn, when the growth is really good? I only charge customers for it that only want their lawns cut bi-weekly.<br> After all. It does take extra time to do, and time is money for us.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-11-2000, 10:40 PM
Lazer Lazer is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,446
We do not charge extra when the grass grows fast or charge less when the grass grows slow.<p>We mow all customers weekly. <p>We know prior to quoting how much that lawn will grow in typical weather conditions.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-11-2000, 11:38 PM
Lance720 Lance720 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada
Posts: 54
I have let double cuts go in the past Victor and it always seems to come back to haunt me. If people are charged for this service hopefully they will get you in weekly instead. Personally I'm not interested in anything bi-weekly this year(except in times of drought). Goood Luck<br> Lance<br>
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-12-2000, 08:56 AM
NateinAtl NateinAtl is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 121
The only time I believe this should be done is if it is the first time you mow their lawn. What I mean is; if they flag you down while you are heading to one of your current customers and tell you they haven't been able to mow their lawn in a month.--then you double charge. Or if you get a call for a full maintenance account starting late in the season. When you arrive and their lawn is extremly high--you double charge the first visit. I don't think you will have a hard time explaining this to customers. When I take on customers that only want service on a bi-weekly plan, I factor that in and give them a price at least $5 higher than I normally would. <p>You should also keep in mind that mowing everyother week may hurt you. What if a neighbor is needing maintenance, and they see how out of control one of your bi-weekly lawns has gotten, you will have a hard time convencing this potential customer that you do solid work.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2000, 09:27 AM
Eric ELM Eric ELM is offline
Husband, Father, Friend, Angel
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Posts: 4,831
We also won't mow on a every other week schedule. If you start it, they all want to save money. It is harder on the equipment and more work period. When the grass is growing fast in the spring, we try to mow the worst ones twice a week. We also charge them for twice a week, but I also talk this over first with the customer. I don't think we will have to worry about it this year as dry as it is. I'm hoping for once a week this spring. <p>----------<br>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.townserver.com/elm/&quot;&gt;Eric@ELM&lt;/a&gt;<br>
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2000, 12:02 PM
steven Bousquet steven Bousquet is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 138
yes we do. We mow every seven days +- 1 day. if due to rain we are unable to mow we charge extra. Example ON day 7 its a friday and it rains fri and sat we cut on monday a $40 may be $60. and will cut on fri for $40.<br>this is right in the contract. Been doing that for about 10 years, the first seven years I would eat the extra time but had a hard time making money in the spring, not any more.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 PM.

Page generated in 0.07952 seconds with 7 queries