Register free!
Search
 
     

Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2008, 02:28 PM
humble1's Avatar
humble1 humble1 is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 2,308
PG Question on spraying

So im trying to build a spray rig for my ztr.

Ok if the label is the law, and the label says 1 gallon of water per X oz of chemical to spread over 1000 sq ft of turf. Then how is it possible that the PG applies almost 1/4 of a gallon per 1000 sq ft?
I understand it is low volume so do you put 4 times the chemical per gallon of water? Isnt that against the label?
__________________
1-Z-plugger
1-lawnsolutions aerator wb
1-Bluebird 48 tow behind
1-Z-Spray Int
1-T-3000
1-Permagreen Mag
4-backpackmistblowers
1-Four Wheeler with 50ft air blast mist sprayer
1-F-250 4x4 supercab p/u
1-E-250 van w-enclosed trailer
1-E-150 van
2-landscape trailers
a ton of backpack sprayers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-28-2008, 03:50 PM
ted putnam's Avatar
ted putnam ted putnam is offline
LawnSite Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 4,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by humble1 View Post
So im trying to build a spray rig for my ztr.

Ok if the label is the law, and the label says 1 gallon of water per X oz of chemical to spread over 1000 sq ft of turf. Then how is it possible that the PG applies almost 1/4 of a gallon per 1000 sq ft?
I understand it is low volume so do you put 4 times the chemical per gallon of water? Isnt that against the label?
That's what I thought also. But, at least with my state and a couple of the others, if you are getting the same amount of active ingredient over that same area, it doesn't matter whether you use 20 gal of water as a carrier or 200. So , if the label says use 2 pints per acre and your piece of equipment sprays 20 gals per acre. Put your 2 pints in there and you should be fine. I personally would check with my state for individual regulations just to CYA.
__________________
"The Poor Fish" circa 1930's: The Poor Fish wouldn't have been caught if he'd known enough to keep his fool mouth shut.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2008, 04:16 PM
Shades of Green LService's Avatar
Shades of Green LService Shades of Green LService is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,005
Water isn't the issue. It's the AI. Your still getting same amount of product down p/1000
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-28-2008, 04:50 PM
rcreech's Avatar
rcreech rcreech is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: OHIO
Posts: 5,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shades of Green LService View Post
Water isn't the issue. It's the AI. Your still getting same amount of product down p/1000
The label is the law..but sometimes you have to read between the lines and/or interpit the label.


Shades of Green is right!

We just talked about this last week ( Huh guys)!

I was very confident of this, but called my Lesco man last week and he talked to the state guy. That state doesn't care about the carrier amount only the amount of AI that you apply/given area!

Like Ted said, check with your state, but I am confident that none would have a problem with it!

When going low volume make sure you use the correct tips so your micron size is good and you don't get excessive drift!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-28-2008, 05:18 PM
Whitey4's Avatar
Whitey4 Whitey4 is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,448
I am going to disagree here... and yeah, I know I'm a newbie. Looking over my CORE, they talk about illegal residue concentrations. I think if the label specifically calls for a mix ratio, that is how concentrated the mixture is supposed to be. The phytotoxicity of the material will also be affected. As I understand it, a lower concentration of AI to carrier is fine, but a more highly concentrated mixture is not. That would be the definition of an illegal residue, would'nt it?

In other words, controls that specifically call for a mix ratio may make some equipment ill suited for that particular app. You wouldn't apply it without a carrier, and the label specifically calls for a mix ratio. I think using a half gallon per X AI when a full gallon is called for is a cut and dry violation of the label.

I understand this is the pat "test" answer....
__________________
Just me and Badger the beer dog!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-28-2008, 05:31 PM
rcreech's Avatar
rcreech rcreech is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: OHIO
Posts: 5,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitey4 View Post
I am going to disagree here... and yeah, I know I'm a newbie. Looking over my CORE, they talk about illegal residue concentrations. I think if the label specifically calls for a mix ratio, that is how concentrated the mixture is supposed to be. The phytotoxicity of the material will also be affected. As I understand it, a lower concentration of AI to carrier is fine, but a more highly concentrated mixture is not. That would be the definition of an illegal residue, would'nt it?

In other words, controls that specifically call for a mix ratio may make some equipment ill suited for that particular app. You wouldn't apply it without a carrier, and the label specifically calls for a mix ratio. I think using a half gallon per X AI when a full gallon is called for is a cut and dry violation of the label.

I understand this is the pat "test" answer....
Whitey,

I am not sure what part of the CORE you got the "illegal residue concentrations", but I would guess this has nothing to do with applications. I would guess this has something to do with spills or something with loading, but that is just a guess since I am not exactly sure what you are discussing.

If the label states a certain "ratio or mix %) for the product then that would be the law. I just don't know of any products that are this way...that I use anyway!

I have used alot of products both on the farm and for my lawn care business, and I have never heard of a "mix ratio" before.

Do you have an example of a label that discusses the mix ration you are talking about?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-28-2008, 05:49 PM
americanlawn's Avatar
americanlawn americanlawn is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: midwest
Posts: 5,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitey4 View Post
I am going to disagree here... and yeah, I know I'm a newbie. Looking over my CORE, they talk about illegal residue concentrations. I think if the label specifically calls for a mix ratio, that is how concentrated the mixture is supposed to be. The phytotoxicity of the material will also be affected. As I understand it, a lower concentration of AI to carrier is fine, but a more highly concentrated mixture is not. That would be the definition of an illegal residue, would'nt it?

In other words, controls that specifically call for a mix ratio may make some equipment ill suited for that particular app. You wouldn't apply it without a carrier, and the label specifically calls for a mix ratio. I think using a half gallon per X AI when a full gallon is called for is a cut and dry violation of the label.

I understand this is the pat "test" answer....
Here's what I would do. Shop for a different product that does the same job, yet allows you to apply it at the amount per acre you want.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-28-2008, 05:57 PM
Runner's Avatar
Runner Runner is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Flint, Michigan
Posts: 13,494
Here in Michigan, believe it or not, it is an issue. there are many products that we cannot or or will not spray with a PG, but then again, there are many we do that we are not supposed to. If the DOA inspectors wanted to give us a hard time about it, they could. There are however many products that just simply do not work properly if they are not sprayed at the proper amounts (many surface insecticides and fungicides). This is why when we spray with a PG and the stuff doesn't get watered right in properly, something different should be used. Now, if technically the label states that x amount of total mix is to sprayed over 1000 ft., then it can be got around with layered applications (one over the top of another), but what is that? It still isn't doing what it is supposed to do, because it is too light and not penetrating the surface layer it is intended (hence the label instructions to begin with).
__________________
Joe

Thank you, Dad - for always being the dad that you were. You truly are my hero. You always were.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-28-2008, 05:59 PM
Whitey4's Avatar
Whitey4 Whitey4 is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,448
I just used the words "mix ratio". Let's look at Rounup Pro's label. They list spray solutions as %'s, the highest of which is 10%. To apply it at 20%, or 50% would be in violation of the label. The residue may or may not afffect the material's days to harvest data, but common sense tells me it might. (the CORE verbage relates to the days to harvest and illegal residues) It is more toxic at higher than labeled concentraions, which could affect the PPE requirements. A 50% Roundup application would have to be more phytotoxic than what is reflected on the label I would think.

My interpretation is that if a label lists several %'s, and the highest one is exceeded, that is a violation of the label. Instead of a %, Humble used a finite amount of material to carrier, but it's the same thing in my mind.... that's my interpretation anyways...
__________________
Just me and Badger the beer dog!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-28-2008, 08:53 PM
ted putnam's Avatar
ted putnam ted putnam is offline
LawnSite Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 4,106
I'd like to know where everyone was...oh..about Monday last week. You missed a real humdinger of a discussion on this subject...
__________________
"The Poor Fish" circa 1930's: The Poor Fish wouldn't have been caught if he'd known enough to keep his fool mouth shut.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM.

Page generated in 0.12006 seconds with 7 queries