Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-2008, 06:46 PM
wiseguyslawn's Avatar
wiseguyslawn wiseguyslawn is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 457
walk behind or stander

seems most are preferring the sit down ztr over stander. Would it be worth while trading my 07 36" walk behind for a new 36" stander for my backyards?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-02-2008, 08:42 PM
wiseguyslawn's Avatar
wiseguyslawn wiseguyslawn is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 457
prolly stick with my toro these standers are almost double for a 36"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-02-2008, 08:53 PM
jsaunders's Avatar
jsaunders jsaunders is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: new hampshire
Posts: 1,782
Try to do a search as well- alot of info-
pearsonally I never got a cut I liked out of a wright stander +$$$$$$
__________________
Saunders Lawn Maint.
Sharp clippers and a Broom -
Since 93
www.saunderslawn.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-2008, 09:01 PM
ponyboy ponyboy is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ny
Posts: 1,268
i only heard about the machine that is a 48 cut but one side folds up to 36 for gates and then goes back down it is a walkbehind maybee great dane, why a ztr or stander in 36 if big back yard are the problem try the great dane we only run 48s and larger i would keep what you have but i do not know enough amt of proprties and siZe
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 AM.

Page generated in 0.07457 seconds with 7 queries