Register free!

The Green Industry's Resource Center



Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-2000, 10:39 AM
KB KB is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Northeast Georgia
Posts: 59
Is there really enough difference in productivity with hydro vs. gear drive to justify $1400 difference for a part timer. I am going to try to pick up some extra money starting this spring by doing something that I enjoy...cutting grass. I have worked with others in the past but decided to go on my own because I wasn't getting to work enough. Although I thought that I was going to get a Lazer, I have come to the realization that starting out and especially as a "part timer", I can only afford to start out with a walkbehind. I have decided to go with either an Exmark 48" Turf Tracer HP (hydro) or Exmark 48" Metro HP (gear drive). The cost difference is about $1400 which is a lot for someone staring out and cutting only a few yards. Which should I buy? What your your suggestions? Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2000, 10:58 AM
Retro67 Retro67 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 207
There are two schools of thought concerning the hydro vs gear debate. Some won't &quot;waste&quot; there money on hydros, while others wouldn't waste there time with gear drives. It's really a preference, and I wouldn't use anything that isn't hydro. <p>My suggestion is to look at your hourly rate and decide how many hours it would take to pay the extra $1400. If you clear $40 per hour (which is not unreasonable), you can figure in 35 hours of saved time, the hydro has paid for itself. Divided over 28 weeks ( a common number of cuts) equals 1.25 hours each week you need to save in your first year to pay for the difference in prices.&lt;p&gt;<br>Cany you save 1.25 hours per weeek, even part time? Yes. Therefore, I feel it is justified.&lt;p&gt;John
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2000, 11:21 AM
Lazer Lazer is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,446
Buy a machine you can build your operation with. If you figure time savings, maintenance and re-sale value, Hydro is the only way to go.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-2000, 11:22 AM
MWHC MWHC is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 186
The number of people using gear driven out numbers the people using hydros. According to Lawn&Landscape magazine, 32% of the immediate walkbehinds with decks 36&quot; and greater are hydros while 68% are gear driven. <br>Does this mean gear driven is better?<p>No, What I think this implies is that most people will not spend the extra $1500.00 to get a hydro. Retro is correct, they are faster and will save you time, they probably last longer too. Another reason belts are popular is because employees will tear up other items on the mower long before the belt or hydro drive system fails. If it were up to me, I would buy the gear driven and put the $1400.00 in a tech stock and let her ride.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2000, 10:20 PM
AB Lawn Care AB Lawn Care is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Ontario
Posts: 585
We bought a 36'' scag 14hp dual hydro this season and we tryed both the gear and hydro models,we love our little hydro we don't know how we could have lived with a gear drive.I think they are at least 1/4 faster than gear drive.An other big plus for hydro is they can be use on hills where as gear drive can't do that.We this year have also mounted a blade on our scag for snow removal.We have gotten close to one foot of snow in a snow fall and our scag still pushed its way through no problem.Could a gear drive do that?NO.I'm not saying that gear drives are garbage its just that there are too many reasons not to buy one.An other plus to buy hydro is the resale value.<p>I hope this will help you out.<p>from:Adam<br>AB Lawn Care
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-04-2000, 03:52 PM
thelawnguy thelawnguy is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Central CT
Posts: 2,412
Id like to see the ratio if you figured 48 inch or larger. I fail to see any advantage of a hydro on a narrow width machine, but certainly appreciate the time savings with my 52 inch.<p>Bill
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-09-2000, 06:45 PM
AB Lawn Care AB Lawn Care is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Ontario
Posts: 585
Thelawnguy<p>I noticed that you thought that a narrow width hydro machine would not be much faster than gear.In my case hydro is much faster becouse I use it on small residential lawns and I am allways in tight spots and if my walk-behind was not a hydro I would be much slower.Plus I use my hydro for hill work quite often and in that case you can't even use a gear driven.Even in wide open areas you still save time with a hydro.<p>I think that hydro's may cost more but in the long run you save time,make more money and have better resale value.<p>from:Adam<br>AB LAWN CARE
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 PM.

Page generated in 0.07934 seconds with 7 queries