Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-12-2008, 11:58 PM
ConstSvcs ConstSvcs is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Guilford, CT
Posts: 379
How about the T190 ?

ok.......I'm planning on a CTL purchase next week. Just waiting for a final quote from CAT on a 247B and a final number from Takeuchi on a T130. I haven't tried the T190 from Bobcat but am interested in knowing what the T190 owners have to say about their machines.

I love the CAT but I can't justify a total bottom rebuild at $ 10,000 at 1700+ hours.

I do plan on keeping this machine for 6+ years and figure I'll be logging about 300 hours a year.
__________________
TTolla Const. Svcs. Unl.

Kubota KX121-3
E-Z Screen 500XL
Isuzu FRR w/Switch-n-Go
John Deere CT 322
Turbo Turf 300E hydroseeder
Harley Mx8H
FFC Preparator
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-13-2008, 07:22 AM
mhilton mhilton is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: middletown, new jersey
Posts: 108
I bought a tak tl 140 this year, Before I bought I looked at tl 130 and bobcat 190 and bobcat is not on top of the market anymore and I think that shows the most with there ctl, I think there are lacking in more ways but most important is power
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-13-2008, 09:39 AM
KPS KPS is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kemptville, Ontario
Posts: 165
while our T190 is a tough machine, it is also extremely rough to operate, noisy as heck, and not the best in the ctl crowd right now. I have not run the takeuchi but most here love them. We just got a new 257B2 this year and so far it's flawless. Yes it could use 5 more horses, but for me its a complete joy to operate in all conditions. The rebuild cost for the suspended undercarriage is not an issue to me if my back is still good and my kidneys aren't shaken all day. Try as many as you can and buy the one you like best cause 6 or more years is a long time to run a machine that you don't truly like. My .02
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-13-2008, 10:07 AM
hansondirtman's Avatar
hansondirtman hansondirtman is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Wi
Posts: 49
Ther undercarriage repair costs will be greater on the T190 at 1700 hours than the 247 (esp the b2), actual owners of both have testified to that.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-13-2008, 10:49 AM
mrsops mrsops is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by hansondirtman View Post
Ther undercarriage repair costs will be greater on the T190 at 1700 hours than the 247 (esp the b2), actual owners of both have testified to that.
yeah but at 1700 hours on the t190 it will be the first time replacing things on the cat 247 at 1700 hours will be the second time replacing everything .

i must say I'm very happy with my t190 its a tough machine mine has 1630 hours i believe and to date all i have replaced on the undercarriage were sprockets that were under warranty and 2 shields that cover there hoses and fittings once you take the tracks off. other then that i cant complain about it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-13-2008, 11:50 AM
bobcat_ron's Avatar
bobcat_ron bobcat_ron is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Abbotsford, British Columbia
Posts: 9,913
I'd still take the Cat over the Tak and Bobcat, suspended is the only way to go and with some minor investments in Bair Products line of ASV rollers and idlers, they are damn near bullet proof.

My T190 (1750+ hrs) was due for the second set of tracks, new pair of sprockets, new pair of rear idlers and the front idler guides would have to be machined to get the slop out of them, after that cost, I could buy a new pair of tracks and front ilders for my Cat.

Bobcat and Tak's also like to suck fuel and run hot hydraulic oil, my Cat is saving me money in fuel and it takes more than 6 hours of continuous digging to really heat the hydraulic oil up to max. temps.
__________________
“The only difference between a pigeon and a farmer today
is that a pigeon can still make a deposit on a John Deere.” - Harry De Jong



http://www.youtube.com/user/69rd96
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-13-2008, 01:08 PM
mhilton mhilton is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: middletown, new jersey
Posts: 108
I tested a cat before i bought my tak and yeah they are nice machines but the rollers suck for working in 3/4 stone, because they are coated. Even the cat rep in nj told me when I was doing the demo that Due to the squirrel cage design and coated rollers the cat was not my best opton for the work we do.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-13-2008, 01:28 PM
ksss's Avatar
ksss ksss is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Rigby, Idaho
Posts: 6,857
The T190 is very weak in hp and breakout, loud the hyd noise is unacceptable, if you get it in AHC you have a machine with no servo assist making the machine a workout to run with an unacceptable amount of feedback. These machines are at the lowest level in their class of machines. I cant speak for reliability or durability but with all CTL/MTL the way they are ran has a lot to do with how long they last. They would likely be much more affordable to rebuild than a CAT.


I would look at the CASE 420 Series 3. I was looking at the specs last night and this machine is ready to go to work. It has 2K ROC at 35%, 74 hp, pilot controls and much stronger breakout force, and much higher hyd. flow, not to mention ride control as an option making it much more comfortable and productive to run. Given the choices that you list the TK is much heavier duty than any of the other machines listed. It may not be as quiet or as smooth as the CAT, but it is much better built for abuse than is the CAT. It would depend on what you want to do with it.
__________________
See us at www.kaiserskidsteer.com

Proudly running CASE and Takeuchi equipment.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-13-2008, 01:56 PM
bobcat_ron's Avatar
bobcat_ron bobcat_ron is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Abbotsford, British Columbia
Posts: 9,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhilton View Post
I tested a cat before i bought my tak and yeah they are nice machines but the rollers suck for working in 3/4 stone, because they are coated. Even the cat rep in nj told me when I was doing the demo that Due to the squirrel cage design and coated rollers the cat was not my best opton for the work we do.
If you do more than 50% demo work, then forget the Cat, but even that type of work can be hazardous to any CTL.
__________________
“The only difference between a pigeon and a farmer today
is that a pigeon can still make a deposit on a John Deere.” - Harry De Jong



http://www.youtube.com/user/69rd96
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-13-2008, 03:14 PM
mrsops mrsops is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhilton View Post
I tested a cat before i bought my tak and yeah they are nice machines but the rollers suck for working in 3/4 stone, because they are coated. Even the cat rep in nj told me when I was doing the demo that Due to the squirrel cage design and coated rollers the cat was not my best opton for the work we do.
i was told the same thing
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.com™ - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 PM.

Page generated in 0.10567 seconds with 7 queries