Register free!


Reply
 
Thread Tools   Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-29-2002, 08:29 PM
kris kris is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1,833
Jim .... I hope the pic's work as well as they look ! Good luck with it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-29-2002, 09:16 PM
diginahole diginahole is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Port Perry, Ontario
Posts: 249
Stonehenge- your rant was not in vain. I had been mulling over shelling out for Horticopia this year being under the impression it was the be all and end all in a horticultural database. I will give more consideration to using Jim's method before leaping into that purchase.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-29-2002, 09:33 PM
LoneStarLawn LoneStarLawn is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,415
Jim that is excellent. I had that same idea this past fall, but don't have the resources or the quantity of landscape jobs to actually go through with it.

Did you do the printing on your printer or did you get a professional printing service to perform this?
__________________
<i>Alan</i>
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-29-2002, 11:17 PM
Stonehenge's Avatar
Stonehenge Stonehenge is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,277
Digin -

There are some benefits to it, but I know that when I grow tired of the limitations of the software, I will be looking for something (or seeing Jim's success, maybe making my own!).
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-30-2002, 12:05 AM
JimLewis's Avatar
JimLewis JimLewis is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 6,577
Quote:
They won't let me use a sample pic on my site and technical data (of even ONE plant) to show customers
First of all, I wouldn't worry about it. I can tell you where to find [free] pictures of almost any plant you want on the web. Just email me.

Next, I don't really worry too much about asking for authorization to use these pictures. For one, it's very unlikely that the person who took the picture would ever see any of my work (even my web page). Two, the most they'd probably do if they did see and and were upset with it is ask me to take it down. Then I'd worry about it.

Anyone who is thinking of doing something like this should email me. There are some very specific places on the internet where you can find great pictures of plants and trees.
Quote:
Did you do the printing on your printer or did you get a professional printing service to perform this?
I printed them myself on a color inkjet printer using glossy injet picture paper. They turned out perfect.
__________________
Jim Lewis
Lewis Landscape Services - Oregon
"kickin' grass and takin' names"


www.lewislandscape.com - Portland Oregon Landscaping Company

landscape design Portland Oregon
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-30-2002, 09:35 AM
John from OH John from OH is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 144
Nice work Jim. I have Horticopia and have been disappointed with it. Stonehenge is correct as to the HP printing problems and the poor quality of the plants in the pictures, and the omission of some very common cultivars. I have thought about doing something similar to Jim's catalog and will have to give it serious thought.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-30-2002, 09:40 AM
thelawnguy thelawnguy is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Central CT
Posts: 2,412
Looks nice, but why re-invent the wheel? Any horticultural encyclopedia will have what you need at your fingertips.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-30-2002, 12:23 PM
JimLewis's Avatar
JimLewis JimLewis is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 6,577
Quote:
Looks nice, but why re-invent the wheel? Any horticultural encyclopedia will have what you need at your fingertips.
I guess there are a few reasons.

1) This didn't cost me much money. And I don't know how much these encyclopedias cost but they sound spendy,

2) My portfolio is thin and less cumbersome.

3) My portfolio is specific to the exact plants, trees, rock work, etc. that we use and are familair with, without any of the extra stuff we don't. I don't need 80% of what's in most botanical books. We only use a handful of what's out there in the plant world.

4) I haven't ever seen any such books with as much detail, per plant, as what I have done.

5) This one is digital so I can add, detract, or alter pages as the need arises.
__________________
Jim Lewis
Lewis Landscape Services - Oregon
"kickin' grass and takin' names"


www.lewislandscape.com - Portland Oregon Landscaping Company

landscape design Portland Oregon
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-30-2002, 12:35 PM
Scraper Scraper is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,656
Jim...I have to agree with Bill. AHS's A-Z Encyclopedia is by far one of the best reference books out there. As for details...unmatched. Pricey? Not for what you get.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...728542-8340146
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-30-2002, 02:54 PM
Scraper Scraper is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,656
don't know what happened to the image, but here goes again...
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 AM.

Page generated in 0.09460 seconds with 8 queries