Thread Tools   Display Modes
Old 12-02-2008, 03:21 PM
All_Toro_4ME's Avatar
All_Toro_4ME All_Toro_4ME is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,578
looks like 53717 is Madison, WI
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 09:41 PM
W.L.M.'s Avatar
W.L.M. W.L.M. is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 525
Originally Posted by SuperDuty335 View Post
Add a 3% increase per year.
I just landed a 3 year commercial and I used 3%, I explained to them materials and fuel go up and I needed to add inflation for that purpose, to sell it to them I told them that the average inflation for everything is 4-7%.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:09 AM
Doster's L & L's Avatar
Doster's L & L Doster's L & L is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NW TN Transition Zone
Posts: 615
I wouldn't get too excited about it if i were you. I agree with foreplease. There is a sports complex the same size as you are talking about near by. It looks really smooth and appears to be real easy mowing, but when you get that mower on the field, it jars ya to death! Plus, this kind of job draws lawn guys from all around to bid on it. You can bet they're not going to pick anything other than the low bidder. When the above mentioned field was up for bid 2 years ago, they wanted it cut 32 times per year. The winning bid was $15000 or so. Well have fun mowing that property for a whopping gross income of $9 per hour Buddy!

Bid this property if you want to, but if you screw up and win the bid, I'd think twice before signing the dotted line.

Here's an idea... chum the waters and see what surfaces. What I mean is, bid it for 100,000 or more in anticipation of NOT winning the bid. Generally, they'll let everyone know who won the bid and what the bid went for. Sometimes they'll have a print out of what each bidder priced it at. They do this in hopes that the winning bid will get smaller and smaller as the years progress.
"To have a nice, green, weed free lawn is a LUXURY. This holds true for a Cadillac pick-up. We don't have to have one, we just want it! Our Cadillac owning customers want the nice lawn. They paid for the Caddi, why not the lawn?" The moral here folks is, Charge Accordingly!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 12:18 AM
johnnybravo8802 johnnybravo8802 is online now
LawnSite Silver Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ga.
Posts: 2,297
You know, I'm not even sure how to bid on a job and make a large profit anymore. It seems that if you get competitive enough to win a bid, you have to give yourself very little cushion. If I really added up all of my costs and charged the $60/hr/man, I'd never get a job. In fact, my question is:On large jobs, are you guys charging $60/hr/man or is that more on the smaller jobs? If you have three men and charge that, you're talking $180/hr. which is astronomical if it takes a whole day to mow a property. I don't think anyone would pay that. I just don't know. I just looked at a Wal-Mart that will probably take three men 5 hours to do but at $60/hr., the price looked huge. Even at $30/hr., that seemed high-$1575/month.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 03:04 PM
clcare2 clcare2 is offline
LawnSite Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: indiana
Posts: 224
I watched a meijer go for $ 3.75 an acre during a reverse auction last year. Something like 6 acres of turf.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 08:51 PM
TPendagast's Avatar
TPendagast TPendagast is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,176
Herein lies the problem with those who have little or no experience bidding large jobs, actually going out and bidding at all.

Back in the day, when gas was 94 cents a gallon, ZTRs did not exist and the 48 belt drive was considered a quick machine in comparison to the "Locke" that old timers used,

The going rate nearly country wide was $40/acre.

as a 16 year old kid mowing lawns, a "normal" three acre property took a crew comprised of 2 each 48 inch scag belt drives and a 21" push mower for trim(back in the day it was common to use the 21" for most of what we use a weed whacker for today, the trimmers back then werent quite as powerful or advanced and many companies didnt even have them yet)

Now, the crew leaders back then got paid about $8-$10 and the other guys were running around $6-7 per hour.

That three man crew was in and out of that three acre property in about an hour and half.

1.5 times 3 is 4.5 man hours. 3 acres at $40 per acre is $120 bucks.
The operational costs for a crew back then ran about $17 per man hour so it cost the company owner $76.50 to make $120 so a profit of $43.50. it was typical to get about 8 lawns per day in with a crew like that so a company owner could expect to make just shy of $350 per day, per crew of profit.
This was pretty much the "going rate" back in the day.

Now take that SAME lawn today, but now you have ZTRs and modern trimmers.
ONE guy with a ztr can mow 8 of those a day EASY with the right gear.

Lets say two guys mow 10 of those for ease of math and make the equation comparible.
You pay those guys what? $14 per man hour? it COSTS you about $30 an hour just to run a crew.
TWO guys in and out of a three acre property at $120 per visit is 1.5 man hours (45 minutes total time there) is $80 per man hour.
The company grosses $1200 per day for a two man crew. They are billing out at $80 per man hour,

But here's the catch, 3 acre homeowners were paying $120 per lawn cut back in 1988!
So why can't they pay the same 20 YEARS later??

That property costs you (1.5 *30) $45 to cut compared to the old man $76.50 (chock that up to technological advances that allow improved efficeiency) so you go home with $75 from that lawn instead of the old man back inthe 80s who got $47.50

Heres where the problem came in. New guys,never having bid a lawn before, having no idea what they were doing went out and bought a ZTR and became a landscaper, they figured they could do the job faster and better than it had been done in the past (which is true with the equipment avaialble today) and so becaue they can do it faster, thought they should charge less!

So alot of guys are runnign around with more equipment and more costs and charging $40 perhour instead of acre!
Heck with the cost ofequipment these days and the going wage you have to pay your guys it COSTS $30 per man hour. So for every hour spent you the owner bring home $10 per hour.

Hmmm I think they pay that at walmart for a shift supervisor.

Here's a tip, STOP bidding lawns at per hour, unless every time you go there you charge them a different price (i.e week one you were there it took 2 hours so $80 and week three it took 3 hours because of rain so $120)

Bid by the sqaure foot.
Find out your production rates for equipment (ie 48 rider cuts 48,000 sq ft per hour or whatever) that will give you an amount per sq ft.

Then accurately measure the property.

But always remember never fall below $40 per acre or you might as well work at walmart.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 09:52 PM
gorrell's Avatar
gorrell gorrell is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: northeast missouri
Posts: 536
This is a contract I'd salivate over. I have 3 8' or larger Ransomes/Jacobsen machines which would make mincemeat of this property in less than 4 hours. If no trimming was involved, I'd bid it at $600/cut and make money hand over fist. $600 x 32 cuts is $19,200/ year. I guarantee I'd make money, but some would probably under bid me, but that's the lawn business...........Lynn
"None better/faster!"
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2009, 01:59 PM
cod8825 cod8825 is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 501

Hoolie stated it about best. We have the Parks and rec division of a very large city in the KC Metro are. It has 65 properties and close to 225 acres of moving in it some very small some are close to 30 acres. First almost exclusively municipalities always go with the lowest bidder. Second you can't bid this like commercial because you will be so far and above everybody else you won't even be looked at. You have to bid by the time spent on a job and quote accordingly. The biggest reason that government contracts are so popular is that one there big and two they always pay on time.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2009, 02:14 PM
nosparkplugs's Avatar
nosparkplugs nosparkplugs is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 3,445
I have yet to get a signed 3 year contract for any commercial account, I only can "assume" or get a verbal conformation now that I will keep my loyal customers. This economy is flat out cut throat, accounts that we once overlooked I am considering bidding on. Here in Memphis it is a customer market you have 5 LCO bidding on every job. We can thank the media for education folks on good lowballing techniques, and this season it an't getting any better
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2009, 02:35 PM
mattfromNY mattfromNY is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central NY
Posts: 1,581
Yes, you really ARE an idiot.
But your posts are funny. I think you have too much free time, you really should seek help.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Layout Style:

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Grand View Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:48 AM.

Page generated in 0.10153 seconds with 8 queries