Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2002, 08:23 PM
lantz lantz is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 17
ExMark or Bunton walk behinds?

I cannot decide on which walk-behind mower to go with? Either the Exmark turf tracer, Exmark 48 Viking, or the 52 Bunton hydro.
My partner has a Bunton and cuts better than any I have seen.
Any suggestions? Also, I landed an industrial contract and they have announced they will be closing in two months, they assure me that it wont effect our verbal agreement, anyone been in this position before?thanks for your help.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-28-2002, 08:31 PM
Bunton Guy's Avatar
Bunton Guy Bunton Guy is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: charlotte nc
Posts: 1,609
Which color do you like better ? green or read ? which color is money ? ahhh got ya there ? eh anywho both great machines my new bunton hydro runs flawless. Same with exmarks. Take your pick im sure the bunton is a bit cheaper.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2002, 08:41 PM
Tony Harrell Tony Harrell is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mount Airy,North Carolina
Posts: 739
Hey Bunton Guy, We don't have a Bunton dealer here but we do have a Bob-Cat dealer. Is there any difference beween the Bunton and the Bob-Cat besides the shade of green?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2002, 08:42 PM
lawnjockey lawnjockey is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Knoxville,Tn
Posts: 10
I have tried both, and they both may cut about the same. But, I also looked at how well built they were and I leaned toward the exmark. Also, look at your local dealer. Is he ready to help you at a moments notice? What are the other guys using? Ask them there opinion. I know I was a Gravely man for years but then finally turned to Exmark.. One Lazer, Exmark hydro 48, and a Gravely 50... Good Luck....
__________________
Big Orange Lawn Care
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2002, 09:03 PM
Bunton Guy's Avatar
Bunton Guy Bunton Guy is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: charlotte nc
Posts: 1,609
Tony they are both the same.....only difference is like you said color and the top deck cover that goes over the belts are shaped different but could be switched. most all of the parts are interchangeable being that they are both built by Textron.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-29-2002, 11:44 PM
naturescape's Avatar
naturescape naturescape is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southfield, MI
Posts: 1,690
My first commercial wb was a 1986 Bunton belt 36". It was the only one I had demoed. Big mistake. Bunton sure as h--- must have improved their product over the one I had. You had to push it to get through slightly wet grass, and discharge -- there really wasn't any. Constant clumps. Bunton support was so poor, they would not call me or write back to discuss the horrible performance I was getting with the machine. I sent them a letter explaining my distaste for their terrible customer relations. Guess what? No response to that either. That is no way to run any company.

Exmark will take the time to discuss any problems you may be having, at their expense (that has been my experience). They even called me long distance to discuss changes in their mowers I had e-mailed them about, when they introduced floating decks.

Exmark for me.
__________________
Ray
NATURE-SCAPE, INC.
"Perfection in Lawn Care"

48" Exmark Turf Tracer w/ Proslide XT -- for sale in Spring!
Tanaka 600 Edger
2 Tanaka 230 Trimmer
Makita 4 stroke equipment
Gravely 100 ProTurn 48"
Toro 48" T-bar w/ Proslide will be on the trailer in Spring 2012!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-30-2002, 08:39 AM
Bunton Guy's Avatar
Bunton Guy Bunton Guy is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: charlotte nc
Posts: 1,609
Thats why you never deal with bunton or any company directly....find a reputable dealer. discuss things with the dealer and they will help you out.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-30-2002, 09:17 AM
Tyner Lawn Service Tyner Lawn Service is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: omaha,ne
Posts: 328
I ran a lot of the old Buntons in my day and if they could duplicate the 1989 36" again or the Goodall version of a 52" in 91 along that would be great. They cut great and I could'nt count the times someone would come to work for me and say those mowers handled and were balanced so even. The new ones (BOBCAT) are nothing like the old Louisville design. I liked the mid '90's hydro's they had for ease of operation but they don't cut like a Scag. The old ones did. The handle bars on Buntons also were positioned very nice.
__________________
Tyner Lawn and Landscape-Omaha,Ne. Since 1983
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-30-2002, 12:01 PM
65hoss's Avatar
65hoss 65hoss is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 6,360
Maybe you haven't seen an exmark cut. The blade speed on the Bunyton isn't as high. Which directly relates to the cut.

Sorry guys but your compairing a Hyndai to a Corvette.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-30-2002, 05:05 PM
midjersey midjersey is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5
:blob3: EXMARK IS ALL I RUN NOW. I have tried Scag, Bobcat and Walker and I find that Exmark Lazers are great. I just recently bought a new Exmark Metro HP (belt) w/ a Kawasaki 15hp. It is great. I am a big fan of Exmark. They are dependable, well built machines that are contractor tuff.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.

Page generated in 0.09669 seconds with 7 queries