Register free!
Search
 
     

Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-15-2009, 03:17 PM
JDUtah's Avatar
JDUtah JDUtah is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UT
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiril View Post
That is not an explanation.
I don't care to play games ATM...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-15-2009, 08:14 PM
growingdeeprootsorganicly growingdeeprootsorganicly is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: obamaland
Posts: 770
i dont think adding any post will throw off the "balance"??? but unless it's a manure based post, i would not correct a immediate N requirement with yard post
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-16-2009, 07:35 AM
Smallaxe Smallaxe is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 9,904
Compost is decomposed plant material. The plant material contains the elements that it needed to grow. It may contain 'x' amount of P and 'y' amount of K, but will always be losing some N to the air and leaching.

Compost should be as close to a consistant balance as any material we call dirt.

If some scientist said that the balance of ratios are, "...all off, in compost, and needed to be rectified according to what we believe is best"... - then I would have to tell this genius that he is obviously educated beyond his intelligence.

I have grown perfect plants to maturity in pots of 100% compost that are better than what other people grow in their micro-managed gardens. In pots, with restricted root zones...
So b4 one claims that the balance of post is - off, one should try to analyse living plants outside the lab...
__________________
*
Now that I know that clay's texture(platelets) has nothing to do with water infiltration, percolation, or drainage
,,, I wonder what does...
*
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-16-2009, 11:03 AM
JDUtah's Avatar
JDUtah JDUtah is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UT
Posts: 2,671
I have read a ton of university publications that note a concern for Phosphate, heavy metal, & other accumulation by repeated compost (and manure) applications.

I personally believe the cognition and do not think they are "educated beyond their intelligence".

A starting place to determine if I am off would be to determine the ratios at which plants (turf grass) require and utilize various nutrients. Soluble N, P, and K being a good start.

I may be wrong... who knows. I do know a lot of experts are cautious of it and I do agree with their reasoning. I am willing to change my mind, but please explain your reasoning. Any actual data you have would help as well.

Thanks.

Last edited by JDUtah; 05-16-2009 at 11:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-16-2009, 09:44 PM
DeepGreenLawn DeepGreenLawn is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,372
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDUtah View Post
I have read a ton of university publications that note a concern for Phosphate, heavy metal, & other accumulation by repeated compost (and manure) applications.
Do you think that the heavy metal issues and such may be dependent upon the sources the compost was made from? As in there are things you should be wary of making your compost with such as biosolids?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-17-2009, 07:38 AM
terrapro's Avatar
terrapro terrapro is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: mid-mich
Posts: 1,234
What I have learned in the "organic industry" which I believe to be the correct path to follow, plants need 3 things to be healthy.
1.Organic matter with a wide spectrum of material
2.Biology, whether you support the existing or in addition to the existing ie C/T
3.Plants still need nitrogen, whether you unlock it from the OG with the biology or add to it with external sources

I am not a scientist but I believe these three things can be applied almost any time in atleast the minimal amounts with the exception of course of external sources of N.
__________________
Terrapro Landscape Service
Landscape maintenance and gardening services
Licensed and insured professional horticulturalist
Snow removal- commercial and residential
www.terraprolandscape.com
Equipment list- A bucket and some pruners.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-17-2009, 08:21 AM
Smallaxe Smallaxe is online now
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 9,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDUtah View Post
I have read a ton of university publications that note a concern for Phosphate, heavy metal, & other accumulation by repeated compost (and manure) applications.

I personally believe the cognition and do not think they are "educated beyond their intelligence".

A starting place to determine if I am off would be to determine the ratios at which plants (turf grass) require and utilize various nutrients. Soluble N, P, and K being a good start.

I may be wrong... who knows. I do know a lot of experts are cautious of it and I do agree with their reasoning. I am willing to change my mind, but please explain your reasoning. Any actual data you have would help as well.

Thanks.
Compare the compost to any raw soil - as is, and/or artificially fertilized for years.

Put the soil in a pot and grow anything you want.

Do the same with some finished compost.

Get your own actual data...

Don't believe me or anyone else. Believe your eyes and trust your ability to understand what you see.
__________________
*
Now that I know that clay's texture(platelets) has nothing to do with water infiltration, percolation, or drainage
,,, I wonder what does...
*
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-17-2009, 08:49 AM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDUtah View Post
I have read a ton of university publications that note a concern for Phosphate, heavy metal, & other accumulation by repeated compost (and manure) applications.
Pony up JD, because your general statement has left you on very thin ice. A "ton" of studies would be, say, 20-30 publications in refereed journals.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-17-2009, 12:08 PM
JDUtah's Avatar
JDUtah JDUtah is offline
LawnSite Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UT
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiril View Post
Pony up JD, because your general statement has left you on very thin ice. A "ton" of studies would be, say, 20-30 publications in refereed journals.
I should have made a more general statement then... "Adding compost based on N requirements is not a good idea" (without the balance part)

Funny... none of you have provided any value of reasoning and or data to support your objections. As far as I am concerned, all of us are on thin ice until we provide arguments and data for either side.

I "pony'd up"... now it is your turn.


Also...

You guys read too far into my statement. I did NOT say that compost was bad.

I said adding it based on N requirements is not a good idea. Which I can't believe you guys give me crap for. Aren't you trying to get people out of the "N" mindset????? And yet here you are inherently defending it? A much better idea would be to add compost based on SOM and then add fertilizer based on turf performance... "Get off the N train?"...

Please don't accuse me of saying more than I did. Things like that make this board rather distasteful.

I leave this wasteful game of argument at this... add compost based on SOM... and fertilizer based on turf performance (both before and after ideal SOM levels are reached).

Deep,
Heavy metals do come from parent material. I would leave it to you and your customers preference to decide if more risky materials are right for your program or not...

Last edited by JDUtah; 05-17-2009 at 12:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-17-2009, 12:20 PM
Kiril Kiril is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: District 9 CA
Posts: 18,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDUtah View Post
I "pony'd up"... now it is your turn.
You did?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDUtah View Post
I have read a ton of university publications that note a concern for Phosphate, heavy metal, & other accumulation by repeated compost (and manure) applications.
Am I missing something ... where are the references & links?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDUtah View Post
I said adding it based on N requirements is not a good idea.
If your source of N is compost ..... what then?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 AM.

Page generated in 0.10932 seconds with 7 queries