Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-08-2010, 09:10 PM
AWilsonCreativeServices AWilsonCreativeServices is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 35
2008 F150 4.2/5speed

2008 F150 4.2L 5 speed reg cab XL longbed 2wd with 8,000 miles at an area dealership listed at $15,950. Ok everyone, here's the same boring epic question: what's your opinion of this truck?
I have a small car that I love (esp at 26 average mpg) but I really need a light-duty daily-driver truck to knock around in so I don't have to take my 2003 GMC 2500HD 6.0 4x4 to every little sprinkler, pinestraw, or estimate job. Also, I am being serious about getting lawn maintenance accounts this summer, and might think of using this truck to haul a trailer and equipment. I know it's not a gargantuan tow beast, but it would fit the "daily driver" bill better than the 2003 GMC (also the GMC doesn't have A/C). I am easy on vehicles and equipment, and, most importantly, HATE AUTO TRANSMISSIONS. Does anyone use the 6 cyl/5 speed daily that could give me some imput?

Thanks. Roll Tide.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2010, 09:17 PM
GreenLightLawnCareInc GreenLightLawnCareInc is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 58
Ford's 4.2 V6 is a bored out version of their 3.8 V6 that they used to put in cars and Windstars. Most of them seemed to average about 100,000 on the engine before they throw a rod. They have decent power for a V6, but the life will not be as good as a V8. Ford's 4.6 V8 ran good and would get about 24 mpg empty on the highway. The V8 would be a better choice for the long run!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2010, 11:00 PM
unkownfl's Avatar
unkownfl unkownfl is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Orlando/Windermere
Posts: 3,748
I have three 4.2 autos. Two have over 200k and one is less than 100k. That is total bull that they only last 100k. Your statement that a 4.2 is just a bored out 3.8 says it all. You can't bore a engine that far it would be a two cylinders at that point. If it were such a bad engine Ford wouldn't have used it as long as they did. The only down fall to the truck is that the brakes just aren't enough to stop a load, but this could be said about almost all half ton trucks. I picked up two loads of 2400lbs of concrete in my f-150 this weekend with zero issues.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-2010, 12:17 AM
AWilsonCreativeServices AWilsonCreativeServices is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 35
Thank you both for your replies. I am glad to hear that people have accrued high mileage on these trucks without major incident. Does anyone have experience with the transmission? I believe it's the M5OD-2, which I know is not a HD tranny, but I worked for a guy who ran two reg cab f150s that toted approx 3,000 daily without much problem. The 4.2 doesn't have much aftermarket support (read:none) but has anyone put a cold air kit or something else simple on it, and do they help?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2010, 08:33 AM
GreenLightLawnCareInc GreenLightLawnCareInc is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 58
I have worked at a Ford dealership for 6 years. Just do a google search for Ford 4.2 V6. As for the mileage, I'm sure that you can get more but there were probably 10 V6's to every 1 V8 that needed replaced in those trucks.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-09-2010, 09:42 PM
360ci 360ci is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 985
A co-worker of mine had a late 90's STX short box reg cab 4.2L with the 5 speed. It was a quick truck when unloaded and easy to drive. I borrowed it a few times when my vehicle was in the shop. I can't speak for mileage as after a few days it was around 1/4 tank and I just threw $30 in to cover the mileage I put on it. When he sold it, it had 180K on it and still ran like a champ. The norm for any gas engine is around 150K. If you keep up the maintenance and don't exceed oil change intervals you can double that.

Fuel pump, tank, emission components, exhaust, bearings, suspension bushings will all rot out before the engine will die.

The 'old' 3.8L had a slew of problems in it's earlier years, but the 4.2L reliability is top notch at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-09-2010, 11:41 PM
hosejockey2002's Avatar
hosejockey2002 hosejockey2002 is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 1,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLightLawnCareInc.
Ford's 4.2 V6 is a bored out version of their 3.8 V6 that they used to put in cars and Windstars.
The 3.8 is an older design pushrod engine. The 4.2 is a Triton truck engine, same basic design (overhead cam) as the 4.6, 5.4 and 6.8 truck engines.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-10-2010, 12:13 AM
dishboy dishboy is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: zone 6
Posts: 3,346
I got 16 with A 04 SHORT BOX 4.2 5sp working , 18 empty in town and 22 empty @65
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-10-2010, 01:24 AM
mr999 mr999 is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by AWilsonCreativeServices View Post
2008 F150 4.2L 5 speed reg cab XL longbed 2wd with 8,000 miles at an area dealership listed at $15,950. Ok everyone, here's the same boring epic question: what's your opinion of this truck?
I have a small car that I love (esp at 26 average mpg) but I really need a light-duty daily-driver truck to knock around in so I don't have to take my 2003 GMC 2500HD 6.0 4x4 to every little sprinkler, pinestraw, or estimate job. Also, I am being serious about getting lawn maintenance accounts this summer, and might think of using this truck to haul a trailer and equipment. I know it's not a gargantuan tow beast, but it would fit the "daily driver" bill better than the 2003 GMC (also the GMC doesn't have A/C). I am easy on vehicles and equipment, and, most importantly, HATE AUTO TRANSMISSIONS. Does anyone use the 6 cyl/5 speed daily that could give me some imput?

Thanks. Roll Tide.
Don't worry about 5 spd, they all work fine, especially you are picking up some lawn accounts this summer, Ford 4.2 is not that soft like people trying to say. Towing a Z and a wb on a 12 ft trailer like most people do around here, I see everyday, not an issue.
The problem mostly will happen IF you pull heavy stuff like 3500-5000 lbs or more daily, is the brakes and clutch. These two things are weak on the F-150 manual tranny, mostly the rotors will be shot sooner than anything, then clutch worn out @ 80k or so.
Also, 4.2 is a very durable engine, I have seen many over 250 k , and a lot of them.
If I really want to get a manual tranny truck, I would get a least an F 250, so you don't have to worry about weight affecting your brake and clutch, they are built more beefy than the F 150, but if you can't afford or don't want to spend that money, so F 150 is okay. Think about people who still tow with a Tacoma or Ranger, Froniter....F 150 is way better.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-10-2010, 02:42 PM
hosejockey2002's Avatar
hosejockey2002 hosejockey2002 is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 1,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by hosejockey2002
The 3.8 is an older design pushrod engine. The 4.2 is a Triton truck engine, same basic design (overhead cam) as the 4.6, 5.4 and 6.8 truck engines.
There I go, spouting off when I don't know what I'm talking about. The 4.2 is an Essex engine, similar to the older 3.8.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
buy , truck

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 PM.

Page generated in 0.11918 seconds with 9 queries