Old 02-27-2010, 12:36 PM
tnmtn's Avatar
tnmtn tnmtn is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE Tn.
Posts: 1,009
comparison study link

I was wondering if anyone here has a link to a good comparison study of the expenses and maintenance costs of an natural vs. synthetic sports field. if injury numbers are included that would be a benifit as well. i have found a few through a google search but wasn't sure if there is one that really stands out as better than the rest. I feel as many on here do that natural is better and would like to be able to better back it up or be proven wrong in this thinking. thanks in advance.
'78 Chevy C65 Dump
'94 F-350 7.3 IDI
Bobcat B300
Root Grapple
Box Blade
12" & 24" backhoe buckets
Dingo TX425
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 06:51 PM
jmoore16135 jmoore16135 is offline
LawnSite Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 45
Try this link, http://www.stma.org/_files/_items/st...%20edition.pdf
If this link doesn't work let me know. The Sport Turf Managers Association has done a lot of comparisons between the two.
Hope that helps.
CSFM (Certified Sports Field Manager)
CTP (Certified Turfgrass Professional)
STMA Member
Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 08:03 PM
Deltacare, LLC Deltacare, LLC is offline
LawnSite Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellisville, MO
Posts: 28
There really aren't any great unbiased opinions. Costs for maintenance can be equal depending on your level of maintenance. Many people do nothing on their artificial field because they fall for the sales pitch. If maintained properly (according to those same manufacturer guidelines ironically), a synthetic field can have similar maintenance costs. Some injuries are more prevalent on artificial (rotational injuries in particular). Most trauma injuries are less severe on the newer synthetic fields, however, a synthetic which is not maintained can, over time, become harder than a soil field that is maintained properly (i.e. proper aeration). The entire subject is very cloudy and depends, like everything else, on the specifics of the field installation and maintenance. You can find "experts" on either side with great evidence showing their side is better. The one unequivocable fact is that synthetic will allow for more usage hours than natural. This will also shorten the field's lifespan greatly also. Anyway, don't expect to get a great answer and don't believe the ones that sound great. Good Luck!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Layout Style:

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.comô - Grand View Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 PM.

Page generated in 0.07709 seconds with 8 queries