Register free!
Search
 
     

The Green Industry's Resource Center


Click for Weather
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-17-2002, 10:51 AM
bruces bruces is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 648
Benefits of larger mower?

New mower?

I currently have a 52” Toro Z100 w/ 19 hp Kaw. I am contemplating purchasing a 60” Z (brand to be determined, but top candidates are Exmark, Chopper, or Toro).

My reason for looking at the new mower is that I am about maxed out as far as how much work I can get done with current mower (or as much as I can get done in the hours I want to work).

In looking at the Exmark productivity chart, I see the following productivity numbers:

6mph 52” 60”
Acres per hour 2.52 vs 2.91

7mph 2.94 vs 3.40

8mph 3.36 vs 3.88

By going up from a 52 to a 60 will I gain more than the charts indicate?

I assume that the larger machine will be able to provide a quality cut at a faster speed due to larger tires, better ride, etc, so that property I am cutting currently at perhaps 6mph I might be able to cut at 7 or 8 mph with the larger machine and gain both speed and width of cut. (Also, top rated speed on current mower is 8.1 mph).

Is that a valid assumption?

Also, how many of you find that the 60” is too big? I don’t think I really have any properties that the 52” will fit on that a 60” won’t.

I’m not looking for a brand or cost comparison, just theories on the benefits or drawbacks of going up to a larger sized mower.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2002, 11:03 AM
TLS's Avatar
TLS TLS is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: N&W Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 7,938
Re: Benefits of larger mower?

Quote:
Originally posted by bruces
New mower?

I don?t think I really have any properties that the 52? will fit on that a 60? won?t.

Thoughts?
I would go with a 60" in your case.

1) You'll be stepping WAY up in HP/Inch from your current ride.

2) Increased speed over your current ride.

3) You will notice a difference. Slight, but you will notice it.

I'm not familiar with your current Z-100, but it seems a lesser machine than a Lazer HP.

My theory, go as big as you can comfortably fit on your properties. For most 1/4-3ac residentials, 60" is about ideal. Any larger, and wide open, I feel the 72" machines will really shine.

Good Luck
__________________
TLS
2004 GMC 2500HD Reg Cab BOSS 9.2 V-Plow
2013 eXmark LazerZ X-Series 60" 34hp EFI (RED) Kohler
2006 Hustler SuperZ 28EFI 60" Power Chute Design OCDC SOLD!
Perma-green Magnum
1996 48" SCAG Belt WB 14hp Kawasaki Classic Deck
Echo 2 strokes PB-755 & SRM 280
Eastman WM20H 20" Commercial Push mower (NEW for 2013)
Commercial Lawnboy trim mower 3-FOR SALE!http://www.lawnsite.com/showthread.php?t=424203
Solo since 1980
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-17-2002, 11:14 AM
scott's turf scott's turf is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NH
Posts: 949
I just purchased a 52" lazer after demoing it for 2 days. I found that the 60" would be just too big for my properties and result in more trimming, which I hate. There are very few lawns that I can mow at wide open speed, which is only 9.5 mph I think. They are just too bumpy. I think you will only notice a big difference from the 52 and 60 if you are mowing wide open properties that take several hours to do because you are not going to make up any time driving from job to job or trimming with the 60". In fact you may increase your trimming. Plus the 60" was another $1000 more.
__________________
Home Turf Lawn Care
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-17-2002, 11:30 AM
MikeLT1Z28's Avatar
MikeLT1Z28 MikeLT1Z28 is offline
LawnSite Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,725
don't forget exmark rates theirs at 80% efficiency where as most others rate at 100% which we know isn't real world.
__________________
Mike C.

60" Exmark Lazer Z 26 EFI with Ultra Vac
redmax bcz3000
redmax 7001
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-17-2002, 11:42 AM
bruces bruces is offline
LawnSite Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 648
Quote:
Originally posted by MikeLT1Z28
don't forget exmark rates theirs at 80% efficiency where as most others rate at 100% which we know isn't real world.
Right Mike, my production numbers are all from the Exmark chart at 80%.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-17-2002, 12:26 PM
bettern'goats bettern'goats is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 23
I just bought a 61" Scag Turf Tiger and find it very appealing...yes you may have to trim a little more....but, you make up for time lost with a bigger mowing deck. I'm new so take it for what's it's worth...Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-17-2002, 12:32 PM
awm awm is offline
LawnSite Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: stanfield nc
Posts: 3,354
i guess to get the100%,u would have to have a strait line of level grass that would last an hr. lets see 5280 per mile traveled ,.
times 4.333 ft versus 5 ft.. then convert the answer to acres. hmm . ill get right on it. think ill just take their wd for it.
to your question . think about the tradin value,on your mower.this is the variable ,that can really vary if a dealer
is in a dry area ,where new sales just aint happening.u got a good mower so u should have the upper hand in the trading.
sorry dealers. just the way i think.
__________________
aw marks
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-17-2002, 01:26 PM
Richard Martin's Avatar
Richard Martin Richard Martin is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 14,519
The only way to achieve 100% efficiency is to only have to cut a piece of grass that is the exact width of the mower. We recently had a competition where mowing efficiency was put to the test. The rules were to cut 1 pass down the 200' course and one pass back. If you have a 60" cut mower than your total cutting width would be 120" to achieve 100%. The actual cut width was measured at 3 points along the length of the cuts and averaged. The best that was obtained was 117" (97.5%). This , of course, was in a controlled enviroment and speed was not an issue, mowing efficiency was. The competition also did not take into account the grass at the end of each pass which also reduces efficiency.
__________________
Serving Greenville, Winterville and Ayden NC



Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-17-2002, 10:33 PM
hlgmoney hlgmoney is offline
LawnSite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 57
BIGGER is Better

Bought a JD 1435 Diesel with a 72" deck. Takes some getting used to over a Z but once you get the hang of it, it's awesome. 72" and 12mph is very productive. They're twice a Z turn in price though.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-17-2002, 11:31 PM
TLS's Avatar
TLS TLS is offline
LawnSite Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: N&W Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 7,938
Re: BIGGER is Better

Quote:
Originally posted by hlgmoney
Bought a JD 1435 Diesel with a 72" deck. Takes some getting used to over a Z but once you get the hang of it, it's awesome. 72" and 12mph is very productive. They're twice a Z turn in price though.
And half as maneuverable, and twice the weight!

If I had a bunch a bucks burning a hole in my pocket, they'd be a nice toy though! Big improvement in the older F- Series!
__________________
TLS
2004 GMC 2500HD Reg Cab BOSS 9.2 V-Plow
2013 eXmark LazerZ X-Series 60" 34hp EFI (RED) Kohler
2006 Hustler SuperZ 28EFI 60" Power Chute Design OCDC SOLD!
Perma-green Magnum
1996 48" SCAG Belt WB 14hp Kawasaki Classic Deck
Echo 2 strokes PB-755 & SRM 280
Eastman WM20H 20" Commercial Push mower (NEW for 2013)
Commercial Lawnboy trim mower 3-FOR SALE!http://www.lawnsite.com/showthread.php?t=424203
Solo since 1980
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2012, LawnSite.com™ - Moose River Media
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 PM.

Page generated in 0.11413 seconds with 7 queries