|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Toro vs Exmark 36" Belt Drive WB
My trusty 21" mower is finally coming to the end of it's useful life, and have decided that the replacement will be a 36" walk behind.
I have demoed the 36" Exmark, and my impression is that it is an excellent machine. Local Toro dealer does not have the 36" in stock, but can order. I know Toro and Exmark as companies are related, the question that I have is there any major difference in the Exmark and Toro machine (other than t-bar vs pistol grip)? I would much rather purchase from the Toro dealer, because I know that the support will be better down the road. 95% of what I mow is well maintained bermuda, and the will be running a mulching kit most of the time. Any comments or suggestion would be greatly appreciated. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I really like the t-bar on the toro, but the new turbo force decks have made me switch to exmark. because of the angle on my trailer ramp, I have to pop a wheelie to load my walk behinds without hanging the deck. the turbo force decks are so heavy that i can put my entire weight on the handles (feet off the ground) and I still can't pick up the front of the mower. I have an exmark and a toro 36'' walkbehind, both have toro mulch kits and blades on them and I really like the quality of cut on both
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
The decks are different. Pistol grips can be painful after a full days worth of mowing unless you're use to it.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
if your going to get the exmark, get the ECS controls, they are more comfortable than pistol grips. some say less effort to use than t-bar
My toro is a 2004 model, which came with the same deck as exmark has |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|











Linear Mode
